Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Suggestions



Message

President Obama -> Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/9/2013 18:45:42)

Basically guys, as most of us know - you are currently allowed to kill every NPC/ Developer in-game and by doing this you earn yourself an achievement (for good-measure). My idea is:

Make Cinderella, located Bio Preserve, a kill-able developer. She is the only one who is currently not kill-able and therefore this would bring new builds and strategies in too the game in order to kill/ beat or even destroy her.


The achievement would be worth 1450 - 1750, due to the fact she is only lvl 30.

What do you guys think?



Stabilis -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/9/2013 18:51:10)

You mean challenge-able?

Now now Obama.



President Obama -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/9/2013 18:52:59)

Killable/challengable same thing practically, you understand what this is saying.. So would you support?



TRizZzCENTRINO -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/9/2013 18:54:01)

why would you want to challenge a defenceless cindy? yes make her challengeable but gives no cheevos.



Ranloth -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/9/2013 18:55:19)

What purpose would that serve except for achievement? Some NPCs are beatable for sake of storyline, or that was their purpose before even prior to beginning of the storyline. Yes, NPCs are farmable now but they mainly serve storyline purpose not 'beat and cheevo' for no real reason.

Her time will come.



TRizZzCENTRINO -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/9/2013 18:58:43)

yeah, this is more llike a excuse for getting a high rating cheevo without spending much effort.



Dual Thrusters -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 3:35:22)

I think the other devs already had enough of a beating.....Cindy's turn :D



SouL Prisoner -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 3:44:01)

Well i suggested this long ago ...

Yes supported!



theholyfighter -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 4:05:31)

Ofc! Supported.
I see some weird comments tho...



Tri Phoenix -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 6:01:55)

i support this if it gives achievement or it is useless just to be challengeable



TRizZzCENTRINO -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 8:15:30)

@above as i predicted, this is just a excuse for getting another free cheevo effortlessly, why not just suggest that they implement a button at cinderella that gives you a free cheevo when you click on it? saves all the trouble.



SouL Prisoner -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 8:47:38)

^Would you work some where for free? without getting paid??

Why do i have to fight someone, waste my time and get nothing ...



Ranloth -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 8:50:34)

If she'd be Lvl 30 (and you're Lvl 35), you get Credits? Derp. Why should you fight someone and get awarded for it instead? Dem morals.



theholyfighter -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 8:58:55)

^ 12 credits...



Ranloth -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 9:00:26)

And NPCs are used for farming now. If 5 levels difference is too big (and too small Credit gain), fight one closer to your level? Obviously.



TRizZzCENTRINO -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 9:06:08)

quote:

^Would you work some where for free? without getting paid??

Why do i have to fight someone, waste my time and get nothing ...

its your choice, plus you are not working for anyone, you are just picking NPCs to fight for your own pleasure and making a extra 12 credits at the same time.
if you think it is wasting your time then don't fight her, fight a heavy mechachilid or a higher leveled NPC. i can't believe that you think like that, just unbelievable.

many of the ED staff work for free, i would work for ED without getting paid, as long as i know that i'm taking part in something that i like.



SouL Prisoner -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 10:50:26)

Errr .. That's more like volunteering, not a job .. Even i would do if i like, but i don't like fighting a NPC for just almost nothing ... well fight someone else you say? well then whats the point of making cindy a challenge-able NPC?

I said yes to cheevo to have something new and exciting in the game, giving a purpose to atleast fight her once ... Its a more like celebration and plus all Dev NPC must be special, not just punching bags to make credits.

If Dev's wanted they could have made rabble a non cheevo NPC u know, but no, Dev NPC must be more special then any other common ones :)



Dual Thrusters -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 13:49:16)

Well look at Charfade, level 30 and packs a punch

Cindy could be about the same level i guess?

Or make her as strong as big tuna



President Obama -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 14:39:27)

Trizz- So your basically saying that you shouldn't get any cheevo for beating any character in game?



Vagaran -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 14:47:49)

I think TrizzCENTRINO is saying not all Dev NPC's must drop Cheevo's.




President Obama -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 15:06:18)

But why not?



Ranloth -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 15:13:49)

Why yes? It's not necessary for them to have a cheevo, especially when it's pointless. If they are as hard as any other NPC then it's not really a Challenge to beat them. Give them 150% power of that of a normal NPC (or double) and then we can talk. If they are supposed to pose a serious threat then why not.

But srsly. Not all NPCs must drop a cheevo and neither they should.



TRizZzCENTRINO -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 17:41:04)

quote:

Even i would do if i like, but i don't like fighting a NPC for just almost nothing ... well fight someone else you say? well then whats the point of making cindy a challenge-able NPC?

you are just digging a hole for yourself, like i said if you don't like to waste your time fighting her just to gain 12 credits then don't, so what if it's a dev NPC? it doesn't mean that it should give players a free cheevo unless of course that they make cindy level 35 and hard to beat.

quote:

I said yes to cheevo to have something new and exciting in the game, giving a purpose to atleast fight her once ... Its a more like celebration and plus all Dev NPC must be special, not just punching bags to make credits.

no, that's not what you think, what you are thinking is that you can get another high rating cheevo effortlessly, every NPC serves a purpose to the game, or else they wouldn't be implemented at all, you would eventually fight them due to mission requirements.

quote:

If Dev's wanted they could have made rabble a non cheevo NPC u know, but no, Dev NPC must be more special then any other common ones :)

that was rabble's first appearance in ED so they decided to do something special, but there is other ways to make dev NPCs special, like increasing its difficulty and level or dropping a cool item.
cindy has been in the game for quite a while.

cheevo must be a thing that is hard to earn or requires effort, i'm against the idea that it could be obtained just by fighting a effortless battle.



Celestial Plasma -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/10/2013 19:54:58)

I support it, make her level 35... and bring it on..



President Obama -> RE: Cinderella Should be Kill-able. (3/11/2013 4:21:55)

Was that post even needed?



Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.0625