Variation
Member
|
Doesn't matter how much you theoretically need to start first. The formula to start first has either been changed or is currently bugged. The fact that players with, according to the formula have a 100%+ chance to start first aren't. I used an 80 support focus TM build before, and people with 45 support and less started first pretty frequently. EDIT: In case anyone wants to know how to come up with how much more support you need than your opponent to start theoretically, considering it has either been changed or is currently bugged, you can read below. First case -- same level. 100 = 50 + (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2)
50 = (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2)
50(2/3) = yourSupport - enemySupport
100/3 = yourSupport - enemySupport
So you need at least 34 more support than your opponent if you are the same level as them if they round up or 33 more if they round down. ________________________________________ Second case -- n levels higher than your opponent. 100 = 50 + (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2) - 5n
50 = (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2) - 5n
5n + 50 = (yourSupport-enemySupport)(3/2)
(5n+50)(2/3) = yourSupport - enemySupport
(10n+100)/3 = yourSupport - enemySupport
So lets say you're 4 levels higher than your opponent. If that's the case according to the base first strike formula you need at least (10(4) + 100)/3 140/3 more support than your opponent to start first which is 47 more support rounded up. ________________________________________ Third case -- n levels lower than your opponent 100 = 50 + (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2) + 5n
50 = (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2) + 5n
50 - 5n = (yourSupport - enemySupport)(3/2)
(50 - 5n)(2/3) = yourSupport - enemySupport
(100-10n)/3 = yourSupport - enemySupport So lets say you're 4 levels lower than your opponent, then the support you would need to start first is at least (100 - 10(4))/3 60/3 more support than your opponent to start first which is 20 more support. All of those formulas are accurate to the either old first strike formula or currently bugged first strike formula(when it wasn't bugged).
< Message edited by Variation -- 1/22/2015 19:25:07 >
|