Xendran
Member
|
Blood mage, supposedly the pure offence class, has the lowest damage output capability AND lowest survivability in the game. Also, cyber hunter has ridiculously gimped survivability due to only having SA as a passive Mercs have hybrid which allows them to survive much longer with high strength. All other classes have a debuff and a shield which raises their damage output and survivability significantly. Blood mage has neither of these. The lack of a shield lowers survivability by a drastic amount, and the lack of a debuff lowers damage by a large amount. While blood mages are capable of burst damage with berzerker, it still has a lower damage output + survivability than the other classes. Every other class is better at using strength than blood mage. Yes, including tech mage. Delta staff with frostbolt blaster or energy stun gun with malf has a higher damage output over a period of turns than blood mage has with berserker. I can understand the gimped survivability, but not when BM is literally a strength BH without a debuff or shield. Main skills: Berserker, strength, assimilate. I see no real reason that BM shouldnt have smoke screen, it's no more dangerous than bh having smoke screen is, and BM is meant to be the damage class. To be perfectly honest, BM and Cyber hunter are both terrible classes in the grand sceme of things. Not unusable, its quite possible to win with them, but when a blood mage or cyber hunter with the same skill and same quality of build faces off against another class, the BM and CH will ALWAYS lose except when they get lucky.
|