Rigged 2v2 Discussion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

Epic Pwnser -> Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 15:49:45)

It's nearly impossible to do "world records" ever since server lock. I tried to do this on Legion, failing all the time due to order and a populated server factoring into this at the same time.
What is the solution to this?

For this discussion:
1. What's the correct order to match people?
For example:
The persons that are doing records 2v2 are 1,2,3,4.
I believe it is 1 and 4 are matched, while 2 and 3 and matched.

2. Don't you think a low populated server should be open at all times? Just for these events and competitions such as the Frostbane v.s. Azrael's Bane Tourney?


Discuss and don't flame each other. I want to hear opinions about this topic. Thanks.



BurningFlames -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 15:51:39)

They should just have it so you can set a 2v2 up with your friends and it does NOT count towards your record



IsaiahtheMage -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 16:00:55)

Excellent idea Flames.



DeathGuard -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 16:03:24)

Same goes for when one players wants to break some records in highest damage, etc. At least three servers open should be left.



Luna_moonraider -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 16:13:50)

maybe we can use the link system to make rigged 2v2 possible. also rigged 2v2 will not count in wins like boss battles. or they cn just open all the servers again.




Light Stridr -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 16:39:11)

Rigged 2v2 would be nicer I guess.



charwelly -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 16:41:29)

To tell you the truth, I don't even know why they
intrduced the server lock thing just ruins world record breaking



ajs777 -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 17:19:39)

This is why we need to start asking for the ability to host 2v2 battles



helloguy -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 17:20:25)

i agree



Tiago X -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 17:25:54)

Using the ally link to 2vs2 wold be great, however it wold give Titan a EPIC headache.



TurkishIncubus -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 17:43:42)

If i remember correct admins do the server lock because new player go to low populated server and cant find battles than quit.

So here is my solution , Open all servers , if the ppl in server less than 300 than before joining server a message occure and tell , "This server has less duelers inside , we suggest you to connect more populous server to find battles easyly" and under this message there should be 2 buttons that say "Still connect the server" and " Choose another server"

Simple Solution.



Tiago X -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 17:49:01)

^Or, they could make those servers availible for lvl 25+ which wold be hard, since you chose the character you want to play in, after you choose the server you wish to play in.



Chosen 0ne -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 19:29:11)

the highest lvl player goes with the lowest lvl player. Thats how its matched.



ajs777 -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 19:29:15)

OR they could do what would be the best solution, keep server lock and make it so we can host our own 2v2 battles, that way its even easier to get into same one, the noobs get to fight, and server lock doesnt have to changed



Wraith -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 19:53:02)

@Ch0sen: Our records were done with 33 33 32 33



MrBones -> RE: Rigged 2v2 Discussion (7/3/2011 21:54:54)

Burning Flame, I like your idea.

Rigged 2vs2 should not count in your record. We could host battle from a house. (would give the house some usefulness)..




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.125