question about new rules (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message


Basicball -> question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:29:44)

i checked http://forums2.battleon.com/f/tm.asp?m=17029388 , but i was unable to find the new rules i hear so much about, please clarify




goldslayer1 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:33:55)

@basicball
u basically cant talk about lagg (oops i did it again[8|])
and rules will start being enforced more.
like
if before they allowed saying "ur stupid" now they wont even allow saying "ur ignorance is astonishing"




Basicball -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:35:22)

yet, they need to write down these rules, to make sure everyone can read them wihout having to go through tons of locked topics

Sig removed. Please only use it once per page. ~Mecha




Infinity Everlasting -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:35:28)

First off, questions belong in the Q & A section. Second, I have only heard of the rule in which topics are only locked when they go off track or people flame, etc. whereas normal Q&A threads are no longer locked. Oops my bad.




Sipping Cider -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:36:03)

You can read the new rules in the link above the ED GD page. They also are having one thread for discussion on balance, getting rid of the fame for fame thread, and tightening up on all the slack we have been given, which is not a new rule but its still new. Thats all I know that has changed.




goldslayer1 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:37:04)

ohh yeah i forgot
they are cramming like 6-7 categories of balance into one single thread.
talk about cluster fudge cookie huh?




comicalbike -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:38:44)

all i know about the new rules is we have a nooby mod that only knows other artix games not ours




One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:39:09)

BB all in all everything we were told we would get to keep EDGD feeling like EDF was just ripped away from us now its time to play be their rules of get out before you get yourself hurt




Basicball -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:39:20)

quote:

First off, questions belong in the Q & A section. Second, I have only heard of the rule in which topics are only locked when they go off track or people flame, etc. whereas normal Q&A threads are no longer locked. Oops my bad.

actually, this shouldn't o ther either, but in forum suport, but nvm that.

I can't folow rules that arn't writen in that topic, and it says nohing about not making topics about lag, balance, fame,...


Sig removed. Please only use it once per page. ~Mecha




edwardvulture -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:40:19)

They were edited by Lord Barrius yesterday. So I guess he controlls everything.




One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:40:23)

quote:

Begging for Membership, an upgrade to any of the AE games, special equipment or extra in-game currency is not permitted. Do NOT do it at all, not in PMs, not in threads. There are no contests for which an upgrade is a prize, either. In addition, with the addition of the "Fame" feature, do not create topics or make incessant posts begging for fame.


BB read the last line from teh no begging area




Basicball -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:42:06)

what about balance and lag? or negative feedback?

Sig removed. Please only use it once per page. ~Mecha




One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:42:32)

I couldnt find those but i found that Non-Varium Vs Varium balnce is both Balance and shoul dbe in th baalnce topic and its Finical and cannot be dicussed




goldslayer1 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:44:33)

@basic
basically any negative feedback. anything related to balance that isn't in the balance thread, or anything regarding lagg is going to get locked or deleted.




Sipping Cider -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:46:58)

Right, I forgot about the Varium vs non-Varium threads getting banned. Their reasoning I have heard is that the threads tend to turn into flaming and trolling between the different groups.




One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:47:23)

@ gold no negative feedback is a unversal rule but can we still do Constructive critism or is anything negative to be delted on sight
if we have a universal Balance thread i can see why no balance threads but this isnt AQ or DF Balance has about six million and two parts to it

and finally why no lag the devs said themselfs Lag cannot be tested on the testing server and if they stay there and find no lag how in gods name are we supost to get the point across that there is lag on teh live servers




edwardvulture -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:47:53)

He doesn't reply to my PM's, just once. I sent him 2 more, I asked him if he even played epicduel and if he would just read a page of my thread before permanently locking it.




Basicball -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:49:11)

lol, i don't realy care, if it's not in the rules topic, it's not a rule, it's just a 'this is good for me right now, so i temporarily erect a new rule' thingy

Sig removed. Please only use it once per page. ~Mecha




Scakk -> RE: question about new rules (8/11/2011 11:49:36)

If you have issues or concerns with the new rules please PM Lord Barrius about them.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375