RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

PivotalDisorder -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 18:15:22)

^^ ah ty redxtra

yes 13% seems too high. it should be a bonus if you get the effect, like the stun gun, not a major part of your build
and also shrinking people is funny, but if your doing it 2-3 times in a fight its not really that funny anymore.



frosty123 -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 18:48:20)

Isn't it 5 percent chance to connect?

It should be blocked when you block. Take a look at Arazeal bane and Celtic Cleaver as far as i am concerned when you block the effects are blocked. Then let look at the chance? It got a 13% chance while the other swords have 5% chance. So logically all of them should b 5



Shadowlord9k -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 18:54:53)

Well you can't exactly block a curse....So I guess it makes a bit of sense....maybe.



upgradefire -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 18:56:50)

its actually 7% for the celtic cleaver to connect it was 5% for the azarael bane to crit



frosty123 -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 18:59:51)

Well then it should be 8-10% or six.



PivotalDisorder -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 19:20:17)

or 6.2758395% ?

at least the Celtic Cleaver isn't so prevalent in 1v1 these days, when it came out it was horrible.
you would need to block them 2-3 times and not get stunned to stand a chance.



Stabilis -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 20:50:45)

I think it SHOULD work blocked because the chance of curse is lesser than the chance of critical!

I think losing 20 support is underpowered.



frosty123 -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 20:55:15)

I think gaining a total of 18% overall luck increased is OP



Stabilis -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 20:59:57)

Total or maximum? Pretty big difference



frosty123 -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 21:01:47)

Maximum. Someone sorta mentioned about gain 7% rage i think 7% something 4% something



One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/13/2011 21:08:06)

Being as i have little to no support, a luck based skill is not something a would be caught dead using becuase no one takes a stratiegest who uses luck to win serious and no offence to those who use Support it is a great skill fo ralot of builds mine just is not one of them. Skrink is a comicial appeal to me i have only been shrunk once and that was by our wonderful Fay Beee here on AEF so even though it improves their luck it is only by a fraction when compaired to how much a high powered Smoke will do to your block rate.



nico0las -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/14/2011 22:00:51)

I don't touch my delta gear nowadays (I'm having WAY too much fun with the Devastators), and I think it's absolutely insane that you are cursed on a block. I, personally, don't rely on support for attack. Now, when a TLM smokescreens me, even if I block, my reflex boost, energy shield, AND bazooka are nerfed, and seeing as a focus build is 50% defensive, I need those. I agree with your idea, it shouldn't work if it's blocked. It makes no logical sense. Neither does deflecting a missile or bullet, but you get the idea



Stabilis -> RE: Cursing, gone too dependent? (9/14/2011 22:13:17)

Dang some of us gone too dependent on cursing [:D].



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375