bans (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message


I am Primal -> bans (2/3/2012 13:11:05)

people with starter wepeon in 2 vs 2 should get banned... that is all.




Sageofpeace -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:13:20)

that or after level 29 they can't fight in 2vs2 unless they are completely equip




I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:14:16)

^agreed i don;t want losses on my record when it;s not my fault losing.




Sageofpeace -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:15:48)

i hate how 1vs1 player comment in a 2 vs 2 thread when they don't know whats going on there




I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:16:34)

omg u read my mind sage so much in common :D




Ranloth -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:19:50)

Yep and what you gonna do, ban 1v1 players from posting? I play it sometimes, and problem isn't with players but prices of equipment which will be the same but easier to get; scaling Exp and Credits will make them easier to get.




I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:22:07)

who said banning 1 vs 1 players lol? twisting words much? and trans how much 2 vs 2 wins do you have 1-2k? i have 17k u have no idea how it feels to get the person with only starter wepeon as many times as i've had.




Ranloth -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:25:56)

Banning 1v1 players from posting so they have nothing to say here because wins are too low. So you will judge by amount of my 2v2 wins and how much I know about the game? I have no idea - putting words in my mouth?

To community: Don't post unless you have 10K wins in 2v2, because lower mark = you have no idea about 2v2 as seen above. :3




Remorse -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:27:16)

I am getting teird of some of the pointless threads.

It doesnt matter if you have a compleing argument or not.

Facts are some things are not gonna change, I would think most players would reconise by the style of updates what things may have a chance of happening or not.


If you have a problem try thinking of a solution that doesnt have OBVIOUS flaws and who knows it may be considered :O




Sageofpeace -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:29:45)

remorse thats another problem they never consider other player suggestion





I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:30:15)

i didn't say to ban anyone from posting i'd love u to try and quote me saying that. and i judge by win% not total wins. but i'm not gonna take someone seriously that probably has a 50-60 win% and between 1-2k wins in 2 vs 2.




IsaiahtheMage -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:32:25)

No. It may not be their fault that they are this way if they where scammed/hacked. It also is not their fault if they dont know how to play very well or manage their credits good or get a good build as well. Because their is no tutorial so it is not their fault. It is the devs.




I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:33:43)

well 2 vs 2 players shouldn't get a lose on their record if it;s not their fault for losing -_-




Ranloth -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:34:34)

Scaling of Exp and Credits is excuse for pushing back balance issues? There are multiple balance issues being worked on now, not just deflection but FEW at once, want a quote?
Scaling is already being worked on, Hudelf is working on that and he is NOT Balance Team member but a coder. Sorry but where is balance in coding? <.<
Flaming the Team is also really, sorry but, pathethic. If you're gonna point out mistakes to other people, may they point out yours? If you have right to do so, they do so as well - where do I start..
Loses by not your fault shouldn't be counted? Then there would be no loses as how would game separate someone else's fault from yours? Please but it's common sense.

Lastly don't tell people what they can do and cannot on Forum. I have less than 6K and yet I post here? That means I'm allowed to post in here! :O




IsaiahtheMage -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:48:36)

@I am Primal and Sageofpeace You guys should not be telling people what they can or can not do on the forums. Telling someone you wont take their post seriously in a 2vs2-based thread if they have less then 1-2k wins or a 50-60% win ratio is down right flaming.




I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:49:35)

it's a down right opinion not flaming.




Sageofpeace -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:53:06)

^ (essiahthemage) dude really i just say that i hate how 1 vs 1 player post in a 2 vs 2 thread without knowing whats going on in 2 vs2 and he just just star saying things of his own

however i do agree with Primal is more logical to take a player who have over 10k wins on 2 vs 2 them a 1vs1 player




IsaiahtheMage -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:53:40)

@I am Primal Ok! Note: Do not post here unless you have at least 6,000k 2vs2 wins and have a win/lose ratio higher then 50-60% or else you wont be tooken seriously! :)




Ranloth -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:53:41)

I never said you were, Sage was earlier. Yet again, you twisted my words. Trolololol.

Remorse is right - find PROPER solution how to fix 2v2. Banning people from 2v2 with no equipment required/basic weapons is pathethic idea. What else - ban players with Varium from 2v2 so you have fairer wins because you fight weak players at times and it will favour some people only. Same topics over and over are posted here about same thing, it's getting boring as you all say the same thing.. <.< That's why Players vs. Mod wars start, because you keep posting the same thing, get warned about it and still carry on - rules are rules, no?




Lord Nub -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:54:16)

Doesn't matter what they have, I actually prefer someone with a primary only weapon because it means it's not a dummy in most cases and they at least get in one good hit like a plasma bolt or something at least.

Most dummys are fully equipped in case they end up on their mains team and when they aren't, they leave the match or just sit there not taking their turns.

At least with a primary only player you can expect something like bunker or plasma bolt at least. I'm basically done with this game until another event or Ally link is introduced, It's ludicrous at this point that every match I would end up with someone just sitting there with opponents laughing and saying that it's their account.

That or get into a neighbors router and do it myself. Fight fire with fire, apparently that's how ED wants it since they can't bring us ally link mode.

@Below,

Say again? I don't spend a lot of time in 2v2? Okay lol




Sageofpeace -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:55:40)

that was me not primal that say that and yes i do think that people who play 1vs1 most of the time shouldn't not engaged a 2 vs 2 conversation

Lord Nub just prove my point(he clearly doesn't spend a lot 2 vs 2)




IsaiahtheMage -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:57:29)

@Sageofpeace Someone does not need to be a pro in 2vs2 to understand how unbalanced it is and what goes on inside of it. I only have in the 800 of wins in 2vs2 and I understand what is going on in their.




I am Primal -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 13:58:00)

i agree lord nub dummying in 2 vs 2 is terrible theres been videos of the factions that do dummy but sadly nothing has been done. also isaiah at which point did i say 6k 2 vs 2 wins? trans that post right there... proves u know nothing about 2 vs 2.

sage i agree with everything u say bro but lord nub is like 85.7 win% in all time 2 vs 2 players xD trust me he spends as much time as me in 2 vs 2 if not more.

isaiah 850 2 vs 2 wins -_- don;t even bother to say who is right or wrong in 2 vs 2 please for the sake of us all.




The Game -> RE: bans (2/3/2012 14:00:57)

If you feel there is an issue with ED or have ideas concerning how improvements can be made, there is the ED Suggestions forum as well as the Balance Discussion thread. The main point here is to be constructive and find solutions to problems, which this thread does not attempt to do. On another note, suggesting that a certain group of players should not post is not a solution, but a problem.

~Locked




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375