RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing

RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [MechQuest] >> MechQuest General Discussion

Message

Hoggs Bison -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:44:52)
It won't really prove anything, and Wolfblade just plain sucks without customization, and if it was customized, it would be a mess.

The Cow says MOO -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:46:21)
quote: It won't really prove anything, and Wolfblade just plain sucks without customization, and if it was customized, it would be a mess. So true

forumlogin -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:51:07)
Eh, RH and MR are better for the higher levels; sub-25 is where the WB's strength is. For the love of sdfklas, though, can we stop bashing on WB? I get the point already. :I On a side note, for someone who said that Stealth and others don't actively advertise RH and MR, I'm pretty sure you're wrong there. XD Almost certain I've seen them going around telling people to join RH, at LEAST for Stealth. :3

Selutu -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:52:08)
@Gamemastersam Every computer, even the most basic has the Print Screen button used for Screen-shots. Also how is 200 big numbers, I've done 300+ with AMR's shoulders. When I said big numbers before, what I meant was that at the lower-levels, it does significantly more damage than the other 2 HMs. Also MQ Community-50 people=/=WB, there are plenty of people outside the forums in RH and MR although WB still has a much higher amount of members. @forumlogin It's more or less just stealth. :P glai barely uses his house stuff from what I've seen and Theif just posts lots of builds with ARH.

The Cow says MOO -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:52:41)
@forum O rlly? Didn't notice. That's cute, I wonder how Stealth does it

Gamemastersam -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:52:42)
quote: You can say that you customize it into a perfect 5-turn kill OP offense build (Repulsive skull, Deluxeblade, etc.), but it ruins the purpose, as that's not even a Wolfblade mech, but a bunch of OP weapons. I kill all my enemies with the AWB in 5 turns. quote: It won't really prove anything, and Wolfblade just plain sucks without customization, and if it was customized, it would be a mess I bet i can kill twice as many zombies as you with my HM vs your HM

Glais -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:53:49)
quote: I kill all my enemies with the AWB in 5 turns. Most Mechs can do this. 4 Turns is the average, 3 is great, 2 is mythical.

The Cow says MOO -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:54:47)
@^ In EXTREME?

Selutu -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:56:14)
@Gamemastersam Extreme mode? I doubt it. Normal Mode? AMR does it in 4. BD > FA > FS > BS Also speed=/=good. Killing more =/=better. If you're talking about killing zombies, I can guarantee you that AMR does it quicker than AWB. @The Cow says MOO At least he used to...

Hoggs Bison -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:57:19)
@Gamemastersam Okay, now your just being pure biased. WB relies on crits, and RH and MR take time, but have FAR superior defense, Romero Zombies need customization, and no default HM can just insta-kill them. It doesn't prove anything, please stop forcefully supporting WB when you don't have any actual facts to back you up. If you love pure damage and stuns, we're not stopping you, just stop over-supporting WB.

Glais -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 22:57:22)
quote: @^ In EXTREME? Sorry, I had no idea we were talking Extreme. Computer was glitching up.

Zanzibaarus -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:01:56)
@glaisaurus_x You never responded to my post in the thread regarding the change to the former SCMMs. Why did you dissapear? On topic: I think we need to get back on topic. It sounds like a flaming frag fest in here.

Glais -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:04:03)
Been having computer troubles sorry, I probably just missed it. If you'd be so kind to direct me to it I'd gladly respond. And well, I agree. We don't want this to delude into anything aggressive or whatnot.

The Cow says MOO -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:08:00)
@^ Heh, I'll apologise if I sounded mean or anything, I was just trying to express my point, shoulda used bold instead of caps, srry. OT: I want to ask, is betraying hard? I mean, is getting 100 betrayal badges hard? I'm coming HAAAWWWKS!

Gamemastersam -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:08:06)
You know what, i cant do this anymore. you guys are posting TOO FAST!! i cant respond to you guys. especially when my brother wont leave me alone.

Zanzibaarus -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:09:16)
Page 4, Post #83 That was my response to your Lord English suggestion and my backing of an alternating/randomization-based Alternians Troll Mecha.

Glais -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:09:25)
@Cow:SCs don't need badges IIRC. I didn't have to collect any anyhow. Never actually TRIED otherwise. @Gamer:Hn, ok.

Selutu -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:13:30)
@The Cow says MOO SCs can just do the Betrayal Quest straight away without any Badges, while NSCs requires 100 Betrayal Badges. @Gamemastersam Alright...?

The Cow says MOO -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:13:53)
@^ KEWL! RH, here I coooooooome!

Death snake1 -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:26:37)
would someone like to send me a link with all of the data on MR and RH's advanced mechs. i would like to see which one is a better build for my playing style. i currently have AWB, and i find that it is not the style for me and am thinking of switching to RH, but not sure as to that right now and would like to make an educated desisionbased on the different possible styles of play, and game on to the hopefully balanced GG.

stealthwings -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:28:21)
@Above Advanced Raven Advanced Hawk

Death snake1 -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:36:52)
@ stealthwings- thank you, this has truly helped my desision, based on how i like to play. MR actualy seems like a house for me. i like damaging enemy stats and buffing myself, and i enjoy doing DOTs and watching my enemies health fall. i don't care if MR has won or lost, i think the house fits me and i will gladly fight my hardest for them at the Gears Games!!!!

Glais -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:40:27)
MR is a fun house to be in, though the damage rates are a bit random. If you enjoy the whackiness of unpredictability you will have fun with it!

stealthwings -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:41:44)
Happy to help. Remember though, it is not just HMs, there are also house weapons to take into account. Based on your playstyle, you would probably still prefer MR, but there are plenty of things which can do what MR does, not as many which can do what RH does. And to everyone who is so sure that one house will win, iirc a while ago someone said that a staff member said that the GG would determine which house completed its goals. Which would you rather? WB: Rule the world (yes, the goal sounds kinda cool, but think about how it would be implemented) MR: See what is behind the door RH: Get dragons into the game I mean, who doesn't love dragons? Fight for RH to bring dragons into MQ.

Glais -> RE: Gears games: requiring urgent balancing (7/26/2012 23:43:45)
RH definitely has the best goal, but I'm not sure if everyone...knows this. Mostly it's best since Dragons have been hinted at since the beginning of the game, plot relevance and such.

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition

0.09375