=AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [AdventureQuest Worlds] >> AQWorlds Suggestions >> AQWorlds Lorepedia



Message

Scakk -> =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (8/30/2012 22:09:36)

This thread is for general discussion and feedback for the AQWorlds Lorepedia. Is there anything you would like to talk about, improve, reset, redo, delete... blow up? Is there anything you can share or discuss that could make this whole process better? If so, this is the thread for you!



LittlePickleWing -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (9/9/2012 8:10:08)

quote:

Scakk:
Is there anything you would like to talk about, improve, reset, redo, delete... blow up?

You have no idea, how long I have waited for this.

There is something, that needs to be corrected, and that's THIS:

The Lorepedia's Memberperks list.

There's so much wrong with it, I don't know where to start, so I'll just make quotations and comments of what needs to be corrected (of course as constructively as possible). Let's start with something simple...

quote:

Master more than 20 special Classes

This clearly needs to be corrected. Y'see, there's 21 current member-only classes, where 11 are clones of other classes. That's already over HALF the member-tagged classes in this game!
And then take the fact, that one of them is perma-rare, into consideration, and another class only need you to have bought 15 months of membership in total, without even being member-tagged to begin with.
I'm not going to go into MindBreaker, but that's only because I don't want to calculate how much money I need spend on ACs, if I want the cheapest membership package with it.

7 special member-only classes. Whoopty flippin' doo.

It should of been...
quote:

Master more than 4 special Classes

Because atleast that's actually true, when you take a glance of every class, that's somehow related to membership.

quote:

Wield powerful & rare Weapons

This needs to be deleted, as no weapon is more powerful than the other.
There's member-only enhancements, but that's only for 1 measly point. Away with that quote, I say.

quote:

Don yourself in amazing Armors

That's funny, because all the most favoured armors always get sold for ACs.
Delete, pl0x.

quote:

Dual-wield Swords & Shields

This is not a perk either. There's AC Sword & Shield weapons aswell.
Hell, there's even a F2P Sword & Shield weapon available at any time.
This needs to be deleted aswell.

quote:

Increase your Weapon damage

Pay over the double ammount of gold for 1 extra stat point? What a perk.
Away with this.

quote:

Collect Seasonal Rare Items

F2P players can do this too, and I don't feel like writing why, as it seems fairly obvious.
Away with this.

quote:

Engage in Challenge Boss Fights

This is a perk? If you have CardClasher, or Necromancer (well, what do you know? A F2P class), you can solo just about anything.
Keyword is "just about anything" with the exceptions of a few Chaos Lords, which are also available for anyone, but that is for a more reasonable cause.
Away with this quote.

Well, that's it. I can't come up on anything else. Happy editing, Beleen.



Junjera -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (9/9/2012 15:03:56)

@LittlePickleWing
quote:

That's funny, because all the most favoured armors always get sold for ACs.
Delete, pl0x.

Favoured, more liked, amazing or not, it's about taste of player, so for me any armour can be bad or amazing, so yours is precisely wrong as well.
_____________________

quote:

Pay over the double ammount of gold for 1 extra stat point? What a perk.
Away with this.

There is a difference at level enhancements which non-members may not have at their level or closer to their level, while Members will, so this is pretty wrong to say as only 1 stat bonus.
_____________________

quote:

This is a perk? If you have CardClasher, or Necromancer (well, what do you know? A F2P class), you can solo just about anything.
Keyword is "just about anything" with the exceptions of a few Chaos Lords, which are also available for anyone, but that is for a more reasonable cause.
Away with this quote.

Can you access Ultra-Tibicenas boss if you'll be non-member? No? Okay.

I believe that both of you and Lorepedia as well is wrong there, since only Challenge boss for Members is Ultra-Tibicenas, while others are not.

However, I agree on else you said, it should have been specified at least if not been wrong.



XapApp -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (10/31/2012 4:19:41)


We also want to thank our WONDERFUL in-game and forum moderators! They make sure you have a safe game to play in and a safe place to talk about all of your favorite AQWorlds-related content!

That page should also include a list of in-game moderators or another page should be made with the list of in-game moderators. List of forum moderators is not needed there as it is on the forums. And maybe also former developers/moderators?



Sato -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (11/11/2012 2:47:59)

@XapApp

Some are Dev's like Alina are listed.



Rtkat3 -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (11/13/2012 12:48:07)

The Lorepedia is looking great so far. I hope one day, we can have a Bestiary to learn more info on the creatures of AdventureQuest Worlds and a section that details the full history of the NPCs that the players have encountered as well as the full history of each member of the 13 Lords of Chaos.



Dragonicoe -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (11/15/2012 6:25:04)

I like the new lorepedia design in all its simplicity. The only thing I dont like however is the lack of chapters in the Story area of the book. Let's say we want to get to the Escherion part of the Mobius storyline. Unlike before we cannot actually jump to that area using the lorepedia anymore, because that was honestly the only use to the lorepedia anymore. It will be alot harder to go to the place I am assigned to go to in the skyguard saga as well because all i ever followed was book of lore's chapters. Please re add that! That's all thanks!

--oooppps wrong forum sorry!! please delete----



XapApp -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (11/20/2012 2:31:06)

@Xia
Yes, the current developers are listed. Though some new ones are missing because it hasn't been updated.

I'm suggesting for a list of in-game moderators to be added and maybe a list of former developers/moderators too.



odsey -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (8/6/2013 8:55:00)

While I like the AQW Lorepedia I wish the lorepedia could include more information about enchantments for each class.



Ĉon -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (5/26/2014 0:02:57)

Needs to be updated...at all.



Sora To Hoshi -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (5/31/2014 22:21:32)

It is in the process of being updated, it's a project Im in charge of. When the classes section is update there will be more info on what Enh's work with it and what the class is good for, ie farming, soloing, pvp, etc.



Rtkat3 -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (6/6/2014 20:43:38)

I don't know if this is the area to suggest this, but can the Lorepedia get full information on all monsters up to now (with an update for each release), histories of the NPCs, and histories of the 13 Lords of Chaos? I know we had a bestiary quest once in the Librarium, but the drops for all the required creature scrolls were low like the runes needed to complete the Blade of Awe.



Apmau -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (6/13/2015 7:04:25)

This has nothing to do with class ideas and i don't know who to go to about this since this is my first time here can the legion quest player vs power be removed its requesting you to join bludrutbrawl to get 200 combat trophies and seeing the alot of people are using bot in the pvp arena/battlegrounds it makes the quest pointless to do



Hitrick -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (8/26/2015 23:42:44)

I have a suggestion for AQW (first...this foruns is so confuse LOL) so i want more space on the game people like me rares collectors have a kind of difficult because we have only 450 spaces on the total for much rares who came in game.
more spaces for the AQW 2.0 it will be perfect!


Another think is about the Packs who came in game..many people didnt have money to put aways when a new pack arrives, for example today i buy 12k of Acs on the morning and in the night i know about a pack "back to school" ( in game friday) but i have already spend my money buying acs today,so my ideia is...

people who buy 2k,5k our 12k of acs on a weekend of a pack who of will arrives friday,they automatic won this pack because its kind of injustice,you buy acs in the monday and only wednesday they announce the pack,and its not everyone who can pay Acs...
for example : Brazilians or people who have 14 years old.

So i really want to this idea become true because its happens to me and happens with much people and lose a good pack,itens and badges its not cool[&:]

Do not double post, instead use the [image]http://forums2.battleon.com/f/image/editflat.gif[/image] button if you would like to add something. For more information, please read the =AE= Comprehensive Forum Rules > Posting Behavior. ~.Shadow//



Gandiral -> RE: =AQW= Lorepedia Discussion and Feedback (7/31/2017 12:36:53)

I think adding a section called, "Fanfics" or something along those lines would be fairly beneficial to the community. Since you have a section for fan art, why not add one for writing so people can display their works. I envisioned, that when you click on this section you are brought to links. The links would bring you to someones fan fiction writings(or nonfiction), (e.g. "Gan's fanfics") and possibly lead to them being noticed. I understand posting on the forums is good, but sometimes I feel like the area I post in is not really monitored and this would be a great stepping stone for people. For how I think that would work is that people would submit their writing to an email or a particular individual. Then, they would select the best "x" amount of stories and create a little section with a link to their works. You could accept new pieces of writings to be displayed every month or so(maybe less), then you could say only one story


Signature Removed. Please refrain from using your signature when posting in this forum. -Laos



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.109375