2 vs 2 for missions (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Suggestions



Message

Drangonslayer -> 2 vs 2 for missions (2/10/2013 20:58:21)

Shouldn't 2 vs 2 wins count as 2 wins for the new missions like the yeti killer. 2 vs 2 is harder and a lot of luck required to win and takes more time.



Fortitudo -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/10/2013 21:59:34)

Agreed. I support this.



blade98 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 4:21:59)

But as the mission says you need PvP WINS ,so you only win a battle by battling in 2vs2 ,not two,so it does count like one battle but still battling in 2vs2 is awesome .
Wait what ?!
Supported !



Mother1 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 4:27:57)

Not supported in the least.

This would not only be spitting in the faces of the people who have done these missions, but it would be adding a short cut into it when it is suppose to be hard.



blade98 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 4:44:13)

^Well yeah I'm already at 145/150 Pvp wins but there are/will be a lot more missions of this kind ,and 2vs2 is harder than 1vs1 to be honest .



Mother1 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 5:06:55)

These missions were made to make you work to get your upgraded yeti. If you want the easy way out just buy the serum with varium.

It is work or pay and if you work there shouldn't be any short cuts. I already both of the 150 win missions and I am doing the first 300 win one right now. Plus there are many others who already completed these missions as well. How would this be fair to them?



G4m3r -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 6:05:23)

75% supported, but only for future missions



the final hour -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 6:08:09)

hmmm ... i dont get your point mother1 consdering most 2v2s take longer then 1v1 fights consderably longer even if a 2v2 counted as 2 wins. id think you'd find it would still be faster in 1v1 .

on that note supported



Shaden -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 11:43:17)

Supported



classifiedname -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 13:00:08)

not supported. it says clearly you need PvP wins (even tho npc's count) regardless of how hard or fast the battle is you just need 150 or 300 wins. if 2vs2 is too slow for you, challenge a level 1~5 npc for quick one-hit wins.



G4m3r -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 13:19:27)

quote:

not supported. it says clearly you need PvP wins (even tho npc's count) regardless of how hard or fast the battle is you just need 150 or 300 wins. if 2vs2 is too slow for you, challenge a level 1~5 npc for quick one-hit wins.


Are you sure? PvP means player vs player...



classifiedname -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 13:21:40)

yes i know what it means, but i tried i out and npc battles count even though they should not.



Mother1 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 13:52:30)

@ classifiedname

They you should report this in the bugs section since it isn't suppose to be like this.



G4m3r -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 14:16:13)

Thatīs weird, I tried it and it didnīt happen to me



blade98 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 15:09:58)

Maybe he fought someone named Npc ? :D lol



Vagaran -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 15:13:55)

^ Lol.

As for the idea, I don't support either. It should be hard to get the Yeti's, not easy. Sure 2v2 can take some time but it doesn't take very long time to do.

And as Blade98 said:
quote:

But as the mission says you need PvP WINS ,so you only win a battle by battling in 2vs2 ,not two,so it does count like one battle



Drangonslayer -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 15:28:47)

^ Let me just say it takes about twice as long due to the fact IF u win u only get 1 pvp win out of 150 or 300. A lot of times people are afk or leave making it impossible to win and especially with the luck factors.



Vagaran -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 15:29:38)

^ Then play 1v1? You aren't forced to do 2v2, it's optional whether you want to do 2v2 or 1v1, both counts as wins.



Drangonslayer -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 15:33:34)

I know i'm just saying that 2 vs 2 should count as 2 wins. There is always 1 vs 1 but not with op builds running all over the place killing you in 2 or 3 turns. I recently started to play more 2 vs 2 and it's a lot more fun than 1 vs 1 although there are drawbacks like i said in my last post.



Mother1 -> RE: 2 vs 2 for missions (2/11/2013 15:38:55)

@ drangonslayer

Well it is your choice between 2 vs 2 and 1 vs 1. 2 vs 2 as you said is time consuming but easier, and 1 vs 1 has a lot of OP builds in them but is faster. both have their ups and downs. But just because one takes longer but is easier doesn't mean that it should count as two wins. If that is the case I could say the same for 1 vs 1 because of all the quick kill builds in it.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.078125