Cyberbeast10
Member
|
@Mega: I'm quite aware how Ice characters are. I've seen the double Freeze dilmena (as the user and the victim). But, like I said, you cannot justify a horrible card with better cards. "Tazer" is better than "Stone Strike", but I ain't mad, "Stone Strike" is still very practical despite being outclassed. "Mark of Death" is outclassed by "Mountain Strike", I ain't mad. "Surge" outclasses "Might", no problem, etc. The thing these situations have in common is that, despite being outclassed, they are still practical. Ice/Snow Orb are so bad they are not practical because they are cost inefficient with a ratio less than 1. I mean, Snow Orb is outclassed by 2 500 attack cards (same number of cards for combo, but common attack cards are more efficient); Ice Orb, by 4 500 attack cards (although in this case, Ice Orb requires 1 less card, but it cannot be pulled off on the same turn). When a special card is being ouclassed by common cards, you know it's horrible! @Jop: I can agree my take on Ice Orb could be broken. The simplest form of buffing is lowering the cost. But, there are other forms of buffing.
|