Willkill12
Member
|
Intro --Although time period dif… --…are some sim.-2 examples (methods+campaigns)--however forensics
Spending time and money on the wrong sort of campaigns --Both cases had difficulties…--key similarity was___. --YR - not Geordie- ruled out - wasted time and money-Sutcliffe rules out… [2] --NP In the JTR case [7]--outlined vague eg.’suspicious/praps-a-know’--futile/pointless-many were-misled police and wastedtm --conclude:similar-misleading-wastedtm-no progress
Police Methods --Attempt to red-hand --[6]ufodigest --likewise female-hope to catch--NP idea of dogs--[6] similarly JTR also involved ___;bloodhounds--Both failed-JTR chased/laughed at; not used
Forensics --intro --JTR left clues; not useful eg.x2 [7]Jack the Ripper video --however dif. Is their usefulness to catch. --tech in JTR not good-19thC-couldn’t be used--JJ 5thV £5 could traced --[3] --Sutcliffe in 5000 - shows potential to catch --however bluffed (clever)
Recording Information --intro --reward meant write ins
-clogged/imp cross-ref/some u, some n/no progress
-NP In JTW no reward/home offive beca. Crafty
-Due to this+police n/approachable (bloody Sunday),
-smaller write-ins/easier to record
-although none helped
RI - Photos of the Deceased
With ex/MK, says [6] --dif as YR takes all due to more tech/cameras/couler unlike 19thC
Conclusion --answer to Q --This is beca. campaigns sim.=dif. Reasons --YR PI was fail like JTR because cruel/no fault --whereas fault beca. Careless/mistake police JTR
-so reasons behind are actually v.dif.
-NP Most decisive=(in enquiry) forensics
-Although no catch, potential. (interview>effective)
-nowadays, forensics>useful(DNA) = evidence of power in tracing in YR
-JTR no tech or links or obvious clues
-key diff. is YR none either but still potentially catchable
< Message edited by Willkill12 -- 9/26/2010 16:07:43 >
|
Printable Version
Icon Legend
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread
