Sir Gnome
Member
|
Right, I'll try and answer as many of these issues as I can. quote:
- Govern Moderators more closely to ensure they are actually productively helping the community - Stop locking threads in the Q&A, not understood to mods players need a place to discuss a question as well not all answers are answered as well as people may wish, leaving the Q&A a place for players to give help more freely is definitely required Mods should only really move in if they have constructive feedback or a post is inappropriate. - Potentially work on a layout more friendly to users - Realize your not working with only children or adults therefore keeping such a firm grasp on the community is truly not required - Fix all this red tape everywhere as you said all these forum specific rules... there complicated and not required. - Set up a feedback thread for all players to suggest their views on how things are run, simply telling me players can post here won't allow the community to understand that, the concept is hidden - Mods need to be less Lock eager, which btw gnome i appreciate your understanding as i don't commonly see people like you roaming around doing the job right. We have review processes for all members of the Forum Staff. ArchKnights are accountable to the Head Moderators of the boards they moderate in, and to the Head of the ArchKnights (currently Elanith). Moderators and Administrators are accountable to the Head Administrator of the Forums (currently Circe), who in turn reports to the Head AE Staff. Generally, in a Q&A board, we take the attitude that if a thread has been answered correctly, or that the thread poster has replied signifying that they are satisfied with the answers given so far, then the thread is locked so other people don't just post in the same few threads continuously with the same material, bumping those and pushing other questions off the first page of the board, where they might not get seen and so not be answered. More importantly though, (as a general rule) a Q&A board is only for questions with definite answers. While (taking an AQW Example) "Which of the new Guardian, Dragonlord and Starlord classes is the most powerful?" is a question, its certainly a question open for discussion, so belongs in AQW GD rather than in AQW Q&A. As to the layout.... Well. I'm not entirely sure what's confusing about the current system. Certainly, I've been around for a while, so I'm used to it, however from the forums homepage you can get to virtually any board in two clicks, and to the majority in one click. If you look at a view like this one, then the function of each subboard is made fairly clear. If you could be more specific about what is "unfriendly" at the moment, then I could be of more help. I'm not sure what you mean by "keeping such a firm grasp on the community". We do moderate the "Community" board that is the OOC Room fairly closely, yes, but this is because some of the topics there have the potential to be fairly volatile. Forum Specific Rules not being needed - Here, I'm really going to have to disagree strongly. With so many different boards serving such different functions (comparing, say, AdventureQuest Battle Strategy with the Clans & Clubs board is like comparing chalk and cheese!) then if they didn't all have rules to govern the specific of their board, then the main set of forum rules would have to be VERY long indeed, which would put people off reading them. The Board Specific rules are also a good place to list the Head Moderator, associated Moderators, and ArchKnights with responsibility for the board in question, so people can easily find out who to contact if they require assistance. I believed that having the board description for Forum Support being "Post all your forum-related feedback and suggestions here. " sufficed to let people know that they could give all their feedback here - if there's something on that sort of level that you feel would improve things, please do let me know and I'll consider it. I'm against having just one thread for several issues though, because as you can see just from this post answering your concerns, this can generate a "Wall of text" feeling in the Staff replies. Spreading things out over individual threads lets each individual issue get attention separately, rather than run the risk of things running together in one thread. As to your final point, the rate of locks and/or deleting will vary by board. I can't really comment on them as a whole, as each will have slightly different policies for different reasons (and I probably couldn't comment on many boards, and would have to go ask their Head Mod myself). quote:
but meh as stated as above, i surrender, giving up on any potential fixes, everyone seems to have a one track mind since it's been like this so long, which is also why people don't tend to use the forums =/ Just to finish by addressing this; we may seem slightly resistant to change, but that is only because we've spent a lot of time trying to determine how best to do things, and we hope that we are as close to that at the moment as is feasable. That doesn't mean we'll ignore good ideas though, either on a global or by board basis. When presented with such a situation, we aim to explain why things are as they are (as I did with the idea of moving vs lock/delete above), to then give the person giving the suggestion reasons why they feel what they're suggesting is better than the current system. If they do so with good reasons, then we likely will make a change (unless there are circumstances beyond our control, such as requiring a large recode of the forums, etc). I hope that answers as many of your concerns as possible!
|