King Bling
Member
|
@Mother1 Idk from where did you get it that I am saying to buff massacre, I am saying the the classes bh and ch should have a burst move. @Exploding Penguin That means chs should either go str or massacre? Well I want to use my new bot and I love f5 , cybers the term itself shows how advanced they are and all they get is the grenade to hit the opponent? On the other hand there needs to be a comparision on some basis i.e class itself since to bring equality there has to be a base to compare with you cant pick randomly any thing and start a discussion. And answer me one thing penguin,I literally see f5 f4 bms now, f5 tact, f5 bh, f5 tms, f5 mercs in 1vs1, not to mention even less of tact mercs having f5 in 1vs1, but you will never see an f5 ch fighting in 1vs1, that is because of the lack of not only the energy gain but they are literally doomed when their energy is drained, not to mention again that f5 returns you back only 80-100 energy back. Chs cant be f5 for a hell lot of reasons, energy managent, no burst damage at all, only a rank 30+ ch f5.can barely survive out there, even tacts have nice energy gain and bhs for the same reason plus MoB. This is not empowering ch but its for the better ment , like the boss, chs cannot beat saeva, I myself did during tlm and changed to ch, tried again but dealt too low of damage with high defns, on the upperhand , other classes go hand on hand with their "burst" skills If you say str is burst, then there should occur no f5's. All would run str. Again the bunker buster is a burst damage since, even with hybrid shield on, normal damage can be 200-300 and rage bunker on a hybrid does pretty descent i.e 400, I have seen myself. And yes a good point I forgot to add berzerker to the burst damage though it needs str and tunes less with f5. You people say that all classes should have some disadvantages over other, then there is energy output, to compensate for it, it needs a burst damage move.
< Message edited by King Bling -- 8/6/2014 21:47:28 >
|