Multiple entries for same weapon/armor/pet/mech/equip series. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [AE Forum Resources] >> Forum Support and Suggestions



Message


nosey123 -> Multiple entries for same weapon/armor/pet/mech/equip series. (10/11/2010 22:03:14)

The subject should be obvious. *repeat subject*

Should their entries be in the same thread but with multiple posts?

Items like the chimeran armor may have a different name before it. But can it be in the same thread like 'Chimeran armor' but with all the variants sorted by level in the post below? Sure will save up space...

Same goes for mechquest, which is...wow, that is A LOT of entries.

Edit @Icy: And of course this happens when i finally bother to suggest this. XD




Icy -> RE: Multiple entries for same weapon/armor/pet/mech/equip series. (10/11/2010 23:48:46)

MQ Pedia has that system. It was changed kinda recently, so many entries are still the old way(threads for each). Since there are about 100 pages, it'll take awhile to get them changed over.




Scakk -> RE: Multiple entries for same weapon/armor/pet/mech/equip series. (10/12/2010 17:02:14)

The AQ Pedia has the entries seperated by name as it makes it easier for the people using it to find exactly what they are looking for. if they have to dig through a thred of 3,4 or 5 different versions they may end up looking at the wrong one and make a mistake when purchasing one.

Some threads would get quite long if we merged them. An example of this would be if we marged all the verious of the weapons the Mark of Hope series has ( 15 in all ). Others have the same issue with their names not being the same at all while there are some where it only has a word or two different. If we merged those then left the others we would have two systems at work which would cofuse people even more I feel.


We have all the version linked in each post , if not being worked on as we can , and are listed in the Indexes , which are being overhauled.




etching -> RE: Multiple entries for same weapon/armor/pet/mech/equip series. (10/12/2010 22:01:05)

^^^ Maybe it might be useful to group the related items together one after another in the indices only?




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
6.201172E-02