The Bansheebot -> Two things (10/21/2010 18:59:22)
|
Avatars: I read the FAQ about custom avatars. I read the points, and I understand the points. I just don't understand how they relate. quote:
12) "How do I get a custom avatar?" The ability to upload a custom avatar is granted to people with a Helpful or Creative title, ArchKnights, Moderators, and other staff members. It is also granted to some people for past service such as the old Grand Council, forum beta testing, etc. Advanced Roleplayers and other group members do not get upload rights unless they have it from some other source. Some official contests will have a specific avatar as a prize that is not available to other forum members. We limit custom avatars to certain people because otherwise the forums would be overloaded with even small images. 13) "Why can't everybody have a custom avatar?" First, practically speaking, storage space can be tight sometimes. We have a lot of posts in the database, and a lot of members. Second, speaking on policy, custom avatars are a privilege used to denote status. They are given either to those who are helpful or creative or to those who volunteer their time. Third, aesthetically speaking, we have made the decision that all of our publicly-available avatars would be based on the Artix Entertainment games. This is an Artix Entertainment forum. If you're not satisfied with the choices, submit your own AE-related avatars or earn the privilege to upload your own. 1: One of the points is the storage space. I honestly don't think this is really a huge problem. In one forum I frequent, they have a size restriction of 19.5kb. There's about 166K members on the site, so that's only 3,237,058.5 kb, which is about 3.08gb or so (if my math is correct). That's really not a lot. Of course, there's loads and loads of posts, but there's also loads and loads of purges, and loads and loads of members that never post. 2: I think the avatars denoting status is somewhat, and very, elitist. I assumed that status was denoted by the custom titles, and, for instance, the large word that reads "Arch-Knight" or similar. And I find people much more recognisable with custom avatars as, for instance, I can say "Oh that is the guy with the Wu-Tang avatar" rather than saying "Oh that's one of the thousands of guys with an Artix avatar". 3: If it's an AE forum, then shouldn't the representatives of the forum also represent AE? Seeing as the representatives and officials of the forum are the moderators and, in general, the people with custom avatars, then I don't see why they should be able to use custom avatars, if avatars should really only be AE related. 4: I noticed the point with rule FAQ 12) that states that the custom avatar privileges has been granted to people from the beginning, active members, and stuff like that. They should get titels denoting that, not avatars. One personal point. With custom avatars, it's much more personal. By an avatar I can already find out a vague idea of some of the user's interests. The use of custom avatars creats more user personality, which I think really promotes and improves on user individuality. Individuality makes a community stronger, and a forum is, after all, one massive community. Now, onto my second thing. The report button. quote:
16) "We should have a report button/ mod alert system! Why don't we?" This has been brought up a number of times and each time it needs to be explained that, while a system like this might work on other boards, it won't on this one. There are a couple of main reasons for this: 1) It would be too easily abused. We would need moderators dedicated to weeding out the false reports from the legitimate ones and we need all the mods we have actively working on the game and the boards. 2) It's easier to just PM an active mod/AK. You can add the mods/AKs to your address book by clicking the button under their profile. Then, when you look in your inbox, you'll see who is currently online. That's the best way we've found to handle people needing to report troublesome threads/users. 1) I don't think it would. Abuse would be dealt with as spam is dealt with, as a warning, then as a ban (if it continues and/or escalates). As long as a strong rule about abusing it is enforced, it shouldn't be a problem. 2) No, it really isn't. Clicking one button and typing a short message is loads simpler than having to copy the post/thread URL, going to the message box, then sending a message to the appropriate mod. In fact, I've even not reported a post just because the process is more complicated than it needs to be. That's all. I doubt anything I say will actually change anything, as the mods and admins seem very adamant on these topics, but these are two things that I think really would improve the forum's community. EDIT: Thanks to whichever mod had moved this. I honestly didn't even see the Forums Suggestion forum. I thought it had been combined with Forum Support for some reason. :/
|
|
|
|