TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message


The UnleaShedWolfZ -> TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 19:35:23)

Well... , After I Got Into 2vs2 Battles , I Saw Partners Like Lvl 25-26 With Me (Lvl 32) And I Lost Those Battles , With Having Low Damages On Opponents And Disobeying The Battle Technique , Like (Attack Lvl 30 , He Don't.) I Am Asking For A Balance In 2vs2 Battles That Allows Not More Than Lvl 27 With You ... Like In 1vs1 And That Should Be Fair. So , What's Your Point ?




Competition -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 19:38:13)

Do 1v1 then.




edwardvulture -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 20:45:23)

This is so screwed up. I'm a experienced level 32 nonvarium merc with all the best stuff and i get a level 26-28 nonvarium who were completely unhelped by this update that brought nothing but inferior weapons that costs so goddam expensive, and I go against these varium people which is either level 31 or 32 I've lost 6 battles in a row exactly as i described.

Watch the language. ~Cinderella




Atomic garden -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 20:46:13)

Basicly theres like three 2v2 set ups...

(L = low levels(25-29))
(H = high level(30-32))

L~~H
L vs L

H~~H
H vs H

H~~L
L vs H




od -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 20:54:37)

I quite like 2v2, more fun than whacking the shadow guard ( although that is sometimes fun =D). Anyways, what I don't like, an this happens alot is everyone else is a lower lvl (except me) or is new to this game, making it an easy win.




Competition -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 22:38:33)

Also, you get low levels because when someone on the other team is a level 30 (your level 32 so it's in range),
a level 25 comes (the level 25 is in the level 30s range) and so on. And if 2v2s giving you a problem, as said before, switch to 1v1.




edwardvulture -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/12/2011 22:49:51)

The problem is not the level difference. It's the varium difference especially if it's times 2.




Luna_moonraider -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 3:35:12)

2v2 is broken the devs need to fix it before they make 2v1 boss battle.




voidance -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 3:45:28)

Um no i rather have a somewhat broken 2v2 system and 2v1 boss then just a fixed 2v2, so keep working on 2v1 boss then fix 2v2 lol.




Luna_moonraider -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 4:13:03)

^so u wont mind getting a lvl 25 partner for 2v1 boss battle gl have fun enjoy yourself when 2v1 is made and u tried 27 times to just win a boss because u get 27 lvl 25 partners and lose and waste tokens. that is why the need to fix 2v2 because 2v1 is similar to 2v2. if they dun players would make a topic 2v1 Boss battles are unfair ect ect.




slayergold -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 6:28:13)

thing with 2vs2 its about who you get inless your superskiled

no wonder no body on 2vs2 leaderboard has 90% wins[&o]

Thats why i do 1vs1

also your partner leaves (some times)
in 1vs1 its depended on you to win




bloodz n cripz -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 13:07:05)

I Agree That 2vs2 Need To Be Fixed B4 2vs1 Battle Mode.
I Agree On Partner That Leave The Battle ^.- [Makes Me Crazy.]





eragonshadeslayer67 -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 14:51:48)

2 vs 2 battles aren't fair, when I try for 2 vs 2 champ, people with really bad builds are able to get wins ahead of me all the time because I keep on getting unfair fights

2 vs 2 may sometimes be fun though when u and ur low level obliterate 2 high levels :P




TurkishIncubus -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 14:55:36)

1vs1 is balanced in some parts , now 2vs2 need a Balance. If you are not a Merc you cant be succesfull in long period , As a Varium player i win Non varium Mercs very hard , I dont think a Non varium Mage or BH can play 2vs2.

And for the lwls , 2vs2 Is all about partner if you got low lwl partner it means a lose for you and a time loss i think there should be a Varium Only server where ppl can only fight with Varium Players.




Zean Zapple -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 14:55:50)

Do 1v1 if you don't like it.


~ZZ




Larcell -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 15:58:46)

2v2 is very risky: your partner could run, lose connection, or be AFK for the majority of the battle...(those 3 things are what make me angry most of the time).


I still 2v2 anyways. More fun imo.




beastmo -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 16:28:58)

Everyone always complains about something in 2v2.... well if u cant win class change or dont do it all




Lectrix -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 20:41:50)

Without Merc: Fair

With 4 Mercs: Fair

With 1, 2, or 3 Mercs: Definitely NOT fair




Luna_moonraider -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 22:39:00)

^ not really true.

it depends on your partners not the amount of mercs in the battle.

27+32 vs 32+32=unfair

worse case is both 32 are varium support mercs an your partner does not know wat is emp when he has it at lvl 3.

do u think a support merc can trash u varium 32 players with a 27 partner. the ans to that is hell no cause 1)27 might run and leave u alone, 2) he gives up and do random skills,3) he goes afk. 4) he does not follow wat u ask him to do, and 5) his skill tree is umm lets just say hopeless*cough cough* max zerk with low str. only way u can win them is hope that one of the var 32 at the other side is afk or he dc. crits can help u but crits are random.




Giras Wolfe -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 22:50:46)

Everyone knows the 2vs2 system is trash. Kind of depressing seeing these threads, surface, be ignored, and eventually dissapear again.




Luna_moonraider -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 22:52:55)

^ i think the devs are finding it hard to fix 2v2 that is why they did not release the 2v1 boss battle give them time i do hope they can fix 2v2 so that every1 can enjoy it.




Giras Wolfe -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 22:57:29)

^Have you ever seen the devs even acknowledge this problem?




Luna_moonraider -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/13/2011 23:00:24)

^no not really but it does not mean they do not read these threads(keeping my hopes high staying positive)




Absolute Truth -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/14/2011 8:16:54)

I've been playing this game from the very beginning long before Epic Duel partnered with AE and I noticed this problem right away and have confronted it many many times in the Forum and yes not once has this issue ever been responded to by Titan and Nightwraith as far as I know up to to this day. We talk about a lot of issues in Epic Duel that needs to be fixed or improved such as this rediculous and out of control thing now with blocks, stuns, crits, and deflects and especially with the crits and how it seems to punish good players and reward weaker players by increasing the luck for blocks, stuns, crits, and deflects for weaker players or especially when people are about to die and this is really a huge problem also. So I hope this also is not just another issue that is ignored like the 2 vs 2 problem and just because many are mercs now because of this problem because 2 vs 2 is easier as a merc especially with bunker buster and artillery strike and max hybrid armor with high support mercs. So people still need to speak up and confront this issue even as a merc. But yes I totally agree, this 2 vs 2 problem is one of the biggest for sure and no doubt something needs to be done and Titan and Nightwraith need to respond accordingly. Just a quick example of the rediculous thing with 2 vs 2 is I am a fully equipped varium Bounty Hunter lv 32 and I get lv. 23 teammates as we fight against 2 lv 32's or 30 and higher and that is just pathetic and rediculous. Some people will try to act tough and brag about how they still won duels while they were on the weaker team and I have done this at times also but that isn't the point, it's still rediculous to have these kind of match set ups from Epic Duels battle search engine.



Edit:

Why isn't this more of a concern and talked about more in the forums and something done about it?


Posts merged. Please do NOT double-post(2 times in a row). Instead, please use the edit button to add additional information.

Please read the rules before posting: http://forums2.battleon.com/f/fb.asp?m=17051241

Do not Spam.
  • Double+ Posting: If you have the last post in a thread and want to add to it,
    please use the "Edit" button instead of making a further post.

    ~AVA




  • Luna_moonraider -> RE: TwoVsTwo Battles , Fair Or Not ? (3/15/2011 10:06:05)

    well i can predict that this thread is gonna be a dead thread then some 1 will strat another thread like this and the cycle continues again and again woohoo never ending cycle like the class opness cycle.




    Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

    Valid CSS!




    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
    0.1088867