RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message


Light Stridr -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/16/2011 12:59:13)

@Isaiah:
I'm going with Angels on this one.
Yes, it is totally unbalanced, but if Titan holds true to any prospects of balancing it, we should be fine.
It WILL become non-var eventually, so don't fuss about that.

I think it is like taking 3 steps forward and 2 steps back. We'll get there, slowly but hopefully.




The Cardclasher -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/19/2011 13:24:29)

If ED fails than MQ after him DF,AQ ans HS. The only game who lives will be AQW. But with the time...




Light Stridr -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/19/2011 14:23:04)

Actually, MQ would be classed as a failure in most people's eyes, with the smallest fanbase and player number. It's a good game, but most people don't like it for one reason or another.




ajs777 -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/19/2011 14:32:32)

I loved (hence the past tence) to play and support this game but i simply dont enjoy it in its current state something needs to change


i have to oppose the 2v1 saving epicduel however, it did not save it what so ever in its current state, the only thing its good for is free wins for the lvl 33s who cant beat their own lvl, and its forcing the low lvls into it they have no choice i think the way they went about introducing 2v1 was completely wrong they shouldnt have brought it into the game with the way the balance issues are. i refuse to 2v1 and ruin low lvl records for no reason and cant believe how many ppl actually enjoy doing it!! its sad really ppl taking pleasure in just massacring the low lvls for free wins, plus it takes over the daily leaderboards now how is that fair?




Cinderella -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/19/2011 14:40:19)

I think something to keep in mind is that it's a foundation. The foundation of the house has to be stable before increasing upon it. Juggernaut battles provide the framework for boss battles in a similar system.




ajs777 -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/19/2011 17:06:13)

well however the 2v1 system is explained i give up on that... it should have been introduced in a better way...and the testing of it should have been harder for the juggers then the teams, then getting the reward for it would be more honorable.

anyway heres a thread i started with an idea about something that could maybe change ED




Sir Xander -> RE: We need to do something to save ED, and fast. (5/19/2011 19:44:00)

Ok Well it is possible that adding Verification perks to ED could be a great way to fix up some of the Varium/Non-Varium gap. It might also make the game less of a P2P and slightly more of a F2P. Also it adds kind of a company wide show of respect to the players and supporters. Not only does it add some cool items it also adds a sense of "....Omg that guy is so cool where can i get his stuff......" feeling. That and when the people see the equipment and they want it They may as well get it in a much more sensible package than 50$ for some badge/promo item. I do realize that its a 20$ package instead of a 50$ one but how lond would it really take ou to earn enough points to get Guardian/DL/SC. Its ALOT faster than saving 50$ in points. It also would add the excitement of a promo item like the bunnies but as a retro thing so you dont have tohave the dissapointment of not being able to renew fast enough. It could also give some collectors the bragging rights of having Verification in all of the games.
I think this could benefit most to all of the players. While also bringing attention from the other games paying players so as a plus it benefits the Devs as well. Anyways i think this could help fix some of the problems All be it not all of them but some, or maybe even one of the larger ones Varium to non varium differences in power.



~Sir Xander




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
6.201172E-02