RE: Ratios (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

ur going to fail -> RE: Ratios (10/2/2011 21:43:03)

I disagree. CH can be really good. I was helping out this guy on a build and discovered very good builds. Read MY POST on this thread

Yes it's a TM build, but works even better with CH.



FrostHS -> RE: Ratios (10/2/2011 22:16:33)

What do you mean disagree? If you're talking to me I wasn't being sarcastic. I'm acually really good as a cyber and win 95%+ unless of a crit a thon battle.



Stabilis -> RE: Ratios (10/2/2011 22:22:07)

^ I love the blockathons and deflectathons.

Well, about ratios I find it hard to say they are worth it. Your record became obsolete the moment NPC battles counted toward your record which sucks!



Shao Kahn -> RE: Ratios (10/2/2011 22:23:28)

Who really looks at their record? I just want to be a hero and stay that way forevahs.



FrostHS -> RE: Ratios (10/2/2011 22:24:45)

Good old Crit-a-thons. Can't forget them. And yes, NPC thing killed Ratios ._. I don't really care about my Ratio anymore, I was always the weakest class whenever the OP'ed were in. Example. Merc when Tech mage heal loops. Merc when Str bountys. Mage when str mercs(Cyber Shalieghla period)



TurkishIncubus -> RE: Ratios (10/3/2011 10:58:52)

quote:

Hey Turkish, If Cyber is at the bottom then how did i beat you? Lol. But yea Cyber is great in 1v1 if you have the right build, I win atleast 90% of the time, if not more.


:O I didnt said CH is at bottom , i think all classes have same chance to win due to Luck factor , but TLM is the fastest class. Also a heallooper CH can easyly kill a Heallooper Supp TLM



FrostHS -> RE: Ratios (10/3/2011 20:39:15)

Oops, not you turkish. I meant sinaster. Sorry xD



Lord Nub -> RE: Ratios (10/4/2011 0:17:00)

Wow so ummm....the topic is "Ratios"

I haven't heard the word since ummm.... Turks initial post and some guy saying who looks at them lol.

Anyway, IMO if a player creates a thread asking whether players care about ratios or not, then said player states they don't care about it, gives me a sense they are looking for an out perhaps for having a bad ratio.

I say don't worry about it. Everyone has there own reasons for playing and no one has to justify themselves to anyone here. If it is more fun for a player to enjoy getting quick wins with many losses then so be it.

Some players enjoy having great ratios and find that to be more appealing. If that's not your cup of tea for whatever reason, then so be it. We all have our own definitions of "fun".



Shao Kahn -> RE: Ratios (10/4/2011 0:24:11)

Personally, I just like leveling up and money, so I tend to use high strength builds on everything. Currently I'm trying to develop a high strength sword tech mage. I don't mind fighting support builds, it is just when they start using two boosters on you and everything even though they have the level advantage and more enchantments. To me if someone makes a build you need to respect the reason they did it, maybe it was so they wouldn't die or maybe it was so they thought the gamma bot was "Shiny" and wanted it to be their main damage source.



JariTheMighty -> RE: Ratios (10/4/2011 9:39:26)

I do care about my 2v2 and Juggernaut ratios, but 1v1 isn't that important because it can be improved by NPCing.



Smackie El Frog -> RE: Ratios (10/4/2011 10:48:17)

+1 Jari. Its all about the NON NPCing battle modes of the game that show your true colors.



goldslayer1 -> RE: Ratios (10/4/2011 17:42:49)

@smackie
if u ask me i think jugger might have an NPC option with it.
they have bosses, its only a matter of time for them to have NPCs



ExampleOne -> RE: Ratios (10/4/2011 18:52:40)

Well, my level 26 merc won 190-2 (no NPC) so i decided to try out 2v2, it was very unfair so i quit the game.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375