RE: CH (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

Drianx -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 6:00:34)

I've tried that one, with even more stat modifiers than the initial build - used Eggzooka instead of that one. Not bad, but rather low HP and not too high strength (I even had 72 str) I found it to be worse in win ratio vs TLMs than mine.



Luna_moonraider -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 7:40:16)

ch are gr8 in 2v2 if u know wat build to use. and ch are also gr8 in 1v1 if u know wat build to use. u need a lot of experience and skill to play this class. but if u compare it with all the orther evo classes i would say it is not as gr8 as bm and tlm. and y would a person change to ch when bh itself is a gr8 class.



Drianx -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 10:52:38)

TLMs are gr8 (=op'd) in either 1v1 or 2v2 even if u dont kno wat build 2 use. So dat reason dont prove ch stronger.

quote:

y would a person change to ch when bh itself is a gr8 class


I assume this is a question, so here it is: admitting your logic, then why would anyone want other class than TLM? And then we should rename EpicDuel to TacticalMercenaryDuel.



I am Primal -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 13:07:27)

ch is actually weak compared to all the other classes has the worst passive in the game and only has one passive.



IsaiahtheMage -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 13:07:57)

Mercenary only has one passive. So no they are not the only class.



I am Primal -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 16:38:43)

i didn't say it was the only class with one passive. i said it has one passive and has the worst passive. read again.



PivotalDisorder -> RE: CH (11/11/2011 16:40:00)

I just think your a bad CH then Drianx. Like I said, I turned over the majority of str tac mercs if they went first or second.

infact, Im beating a lot of tank tac mercs too



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.109375