|
nico0las -> RE: Boosters (12/1/2011 19:20:19)
|
I follow the "If it's in the game, use it" rule.
I am also the last person to ever consider fair play. I'll use any means necessary.
Having said this, I find boosting to be not only a sign of weakness, but also
and lack of skill when building. There are some builds, however, that use a heal.
Tech mages are like that. Although they don't boost often, they heal 47-50 regardless.
Even so, they don't boost.
I understand there are points in time in which "luck", or whatever you want to call it
comes into play. I hate that too. That is, besides juggernaut or 2v2, the only JUST reason to boost.
Seeing as we're talking about 1v1 here, I'll just say as I stated earlier:
If your build is unable to keep you alive during a 1v1, it's time to rebuild.
If you're a weak non varium, then that's a good reason to boost. If you are a full varium, 34, there is
NO GOOD REASON (excluding 2v2 and juggernaut) why you should boost in a battle.
Again. If you choose to boost, that's fine. I'm simply pointing out that you should have the skill,
especially as a varium, to stay alive in battle.
@Below I see what you mean. However, I still stand by what I say. Mind you, I do boost as well, simply not in a 1v1. I honestly couldn't give a care in the world on whether someone actually boosts or not. For me, a Strength based player, I can still deal the damage, regardless of the opponent's health. What frustrates me is actually the "Heal, boost, boost, rage, heal" method some use. But that's not important. I feel that one's build should be able to keep him/her alive through thick and thin. I'm not saying if you boost, you're not good. I'm simply saying your build should be able to keep you alive without boosters.
|
|
|
|
