Lycus -> RE: 2vs2 link (4/5/2012 14:26:25)
|
Isn't it also time to listen to what the staff say each time it's raised as well? The reason why it hasn't and probably will not be introduced has already explained by ND Mallet - It would completely destroy balance. Everyone would just be joining up with people who compliment their build etc. to create truly a truly OP combination. What you have to look at, is the long run, and in the long run, it would create more complaints from people than happy people. It would make 2v2 something nobody dares to do unless they have an OP partner, and for any level 27-31 or so, it would make PvP an absolute no no. It's all well and good saying 'make it not count towards records like challenges', but that wouldn't make any sense at all. It would lead to a coding nightmare, and people get annoyed now with having to do challenges for missions, because they're 'pointless' unless for a friendly battle or testing a build. This would be named a 'pointless feature' very fast. Even if it wouldn't though, then even if the win doesn't count for the team using the link, the loss would still count for the other team. If it didn't then the others upon pressing '2v2' ends up being in a pointless battle they don't want to be in. All-in-all, the feature would just lead to a huge mess, and this has been explained time and time again. If people listened to what staff said, then they would understand why it can't be implemented, and would stop complaining that we 'won't listen and ignore', because we actually have reasons as to why we don't. I'm not aiming that at you LunaWarlord or anyone who hasn't previously brought this up or been involved in a suggestion of this, or heard a staff members point of view on this - but those who keep bringing it up over and over, despite us explaining need to realise we're not going to just change our thoughts because you keep asking. We have valid reasons as to why it can't happen, if you're to ignorant to listen to them, then please don't show yourself up by keep posting it over and over. It's a valid idea, I appreciate that, but it's not a possible one.
|
|
|
|