|
AQSewy -> RE: =OS= Beta Release Thread LX - READ THE FIRST POST (1/5/2013 19:41:13)
|
@Lord Athor
quote:
And what, just because the people who bought the more expensive packages could do that they should be punished for making that investment by having to pay more once again than the ones who only paid a little the first time in order to get the same, new promo?
Everything there is just wrong and against what you're saying yourself.
Now I'm with you on this subject and don't see a reason to reset for 160+ and not 80, however let mé explain what is wrong with what you just Said.
1. quote:
the people who bought the more expensive packages could do that they should be punished for making that investment by having to pay more once again You say so yourself that the meter should be reset so let's Assume this is the plan. Now by that plan it's scheduled for reset no matter what, so tell mé HOW? Is it punishing those who paid for a bigger package to reset their meter? That is just the normal scheduled so no punishing there. What it is, is it's gifting those who bought 80 SG, it's not punishing 160+ SG buyers in any way. With that clear I'll head on to my second point of what is wrong here.
2. quote:
who only paid a little the first time
This is WRONG too, if what Cyber Doom5 Said is true and they buy 80SG's several times then that would Wind up in a larger Price than buying 160 or 250 package directly. With this Said I'm going to point 3 which is purely based on my own (political) meanings.
3. To my understanding what you say here is that the Rich who Can afford bigger packages should be in focus as mich as the poor who can't afford bigger packages. If we look at this in a situation in the Real World it would be something like this: Let us not try to help the poor people in Africa or anywhere Else more than the Rich people, every Rich guy who Can afford their own surgery should be getting as much help as the poor ones who can't. that is just a completely WRONG State of mind IMO.
Back to the top, I completely agree with you (just don't explain it the way you did that was wrong) though on this subject cause the only argumentation Cyber Etc. has is that they Think about the people that don't have a lot of money and they therefore would buy 80SG package several times to get their reward. Now this is NOT logical AT ALL, why would the poor people use money then more money just to end up paying more than the Rich instead of writing around a little then buy the Big package and save money?
I've always had the thought that the low packages are for when you need a few Quick SG's (or Z-tokens Etc.) and don't want to spend a lot of money on the Big package.
Ty for takning your time to read this long State of mind I have ;-)
|
|
|
|
