Gingkage -> RE: =Char= Conflict (4/30/2013 21:48:39)
|
In your example, Trainz, you define conflict as being external. This is a very common form of conflict, and is the type that provides the reader with a thrill. The excitement of the battle. The desire on both sides to win. But internal conflict, in my opinion, allows for more room for a character to grow. Which makes it, again in my opinion, the more crucial of the two conflicts. It is very possible to write an entire story without there being a single occurrence of external conflict, and have in fact done so. There was no enemy to fight, no weather hazards. The entire conflict was internal. The narrator (as the story was first person) was fighting with himself/herself to reach a destination that was not desired. Because if he or she reached that destination, an ugly truth, ignorable so far, one that could be pretended to not exist, would have to be faced. Reaching that final destination, however, was crucial for the narrator to acknowledge the truth, and eventually heal. Does it have to be in every segment of your story? No, I don't believe it does. I disagree with Chaosweaver Amon that every sentence should have some form of conflict (to use your statement as a convenient example, I mean no offense). While it should be in your story, and I cannot think of any story where there was not some form of conflict, be it internal or external, I don't think it needs to be so prevalent as to be in every sentence. Take your character taking a nap, for example. It is possible to make it a form of conflict. Say your character is in physical pain, or is trying to avoid discussing something. In that, it is your character against either the pain or the unwanted discussion. But sometimes a nap is just a nap, with no underlying reasons behind it. :P So, yes, conflict is important, whether internal or external. It can, and I think very often is, an important way to develop a character, making that person more realistic. But I also feel that, like everything, it should be present in moderation. Too much of a good thing, after all, is still too much.
|
|
|
|