3 vs. 3 PvP?! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Suggestions



Message

Rocker! -> 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/16/2013 17:58:21)

Well I don't know if this have been suggested before; but i was thinking a 3 vs 3 PvP would be really fun. I know there may be downsides like long time of fights and waiting more in fights. But i think it would be like a mini war, and if matchmaking was accurate this would be really great and fun and implants more strategies in fights.

What do you think?



toopygoo -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/16/2013 18:13:04)

been suggested, and i unapprove for the reasons that it would be too slow, take too long, grat imbalance issues with levels and stuff, slow starting times, and numerous other issues would arise once it is released, slowing down progress in planned releases.



Mother1 -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/16/2013 18:28:24)

Not supported.

We don't even have balance in the other three battle modes yet and throwing in a 4th will make the balance even worse.

Not only that with such a small player base and it consistently shrinking this will make wait times for the other battle modes even worse.



Rocker! -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/16/2013 18:48:49)

Yea your probably right, for the main reason of the small player base which is even shrinking.
The matchmaking could be done right. And personally i don't mind long duration fight.
But then again player base is low, making long waiting before fights, and making other PvPs slow as well.
But still would have liked to try a fight like this!



GearzHeadz -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/16/2013 23:09:04)

The last player to fight in the match would almost certainly ALWAYS be wiped out before he/she got a turn.



romanu -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/17/2013 4:48:14)

I would like this new battle mode and would support it. They long ago when they wanted t make 3vs3 that one of the players would die almost all the time in first turn. But I guess they can fix it with restrictions so 3 players can't team up on a single one.



Predator9657 -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/17/2013 12:29:52)

quote:

The last player to fight in the match would almost certainly ALWAYS be wiped out before he/she got a turn.


No they wont. What do you think Field Medic is for?



Ranloth -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/17/2013 12:35:00)

quote:

No they wont. What do you think Field Medic is for?

In 2v2, if you go last, you may end up near death unless you possibly double Heal. 3v3 would be either triple heal or dead, really. You're having to wait until 5 people go ahead of you. Devs have already said this will likely not be done because of it, unless a better solution is found.

Also, what if my Field Medic is Lvl 1? Not enough to cover high damage attack.



NavigatorNami -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/17/2013 12:42:59)

quote:

In 2v2, if you go last, you may end up near death unless you possibly double Heal. 3v3 would be either triple heal or dead, really. You're having to wait until 5 people go ahead of you. Devs have already said this will likely not be done because of it, unless a better solution is found.

Also, what if my Field Medic is Lvl 1? Not enough to cover high damage attack.


solution would be to make it so that the same person can not be attacked twice in a row. that being said, I do not approve of this idea, wait for the population to grow and then consider it. as for population shrinking, I haven't noticed any shrinking. I haven't been on in some time and the population seems to be exactly the same as it was a couple weeks ago



Ranloth -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/17/2013 12:47:50)

@NavigatorNami
Exactly what I was thinking (solution wise). It just requires a good way to not imbalance it (matchmaking + turn wise) and bigger population too, since we'd be looking at finding 5 more people within your level range.



Rocker! -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/17/2013 17:48:49)

@NavigatorNami

-You can't notice population shrinking in 2 weeks, before Omega, Sometimes they open 3 servers and couple of times i noticed 4 servers! Now hardly 1st one getting full.


-Considering main topic, maybe heal would be helpful but not if it is at 1st lvl. I think it need to be well studied before done.
And still I would like to give it a try!


Cheers



wireclub1990 -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/18/2013 1:45:07)

population is absolutely shrinking no room for this at all the current battle modes are a joke balance wise . Sorry but nope to this idea . Sure trans if we ever managed to full 2 servers again and balance was fixed it may be a option but honestly I think apart from a few days after updates the population is all south from here and balance wise a few years of playing ED have told me I have more chance of growing money then this game ever being fixed to even a broadly fair balanced state . same could be said for player base size never going to happen till they grasp the concept of equality and balance and they never will . Games on borrowed time.



NavigatorNami -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/18/2013 14:04:14)

quote:

@NavigatorNami

-You can't notice population shrinking in 2 weeks, before Omega, Sometimes they open 3 servers and couple of times i noticed 4 servers! Now hardly 1st one getting full.


I remember a time when all 4 servers would be open at once too, but over the past month the population has remained fairly steady at 700-800 people. it occassionally falls to as low as 600 but that's at the low traffic times.



wireclub1990 -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/18/2013 14:35:41)

^ dude it consistently hits 200 players on a daily basis usually averaging at about 400-600 at peaks the best it ever gets to is 700



Rocker! -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/18/2013 16:14:32)

quote:

I haven't noticed any shrinking. I haven't been on in some time and the population seems to be exactly the same as it was a couple weeks ago


NavigatorNami I replied on this specific sentence u said. Now yes it seems steady after it did shrunk, since i dont think it can shrink anymore bcz the game would eventually stop.. now population is averaging around 600, while it use to average around 1200 before Omega. tht's shrinking!

Anyway it's only a part of the topic and we are disputing about the same point.

In conclusion: If population was averaging around 2000 and matchmaking is fair enough (not necessarily 100% fair - nthg can be perfectly fair) and with other few studies and fixes 3 VS 3 PvP can be done.


And as a Personal Opinion I would like to take a part of such PvP.


Cheers!!



wireclub1990 -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/18/2013 17:51:27)

it will shrink further and its actually averaging more about 400 on a daily basis game has lost 66% of its players .



SCAR -> RE: 3 vs. 3 PvP?! (10/24/2013 13:45:54)

We all know the reason why the population is shrinking is because of "Omega", "Delta" had a big population, as well as "Beta" filling up all four servers.

No body would die going last, if you tanked the battle you'd do just fine, it's because of people spamming "Strength" and "Support" that they die so fast, they have nothing put on "Dexterity" or "Resistance".

I don't Support this because of the lag issues, I have my graphics set to low for a reason, 3v3 would demo, and lag would be struck all over the place.

If the lag issues get fixed, I 100% support this idea.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375