RE: assault bot buff (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Balance



Message

Mother1 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 15:58:38)

FYI means

For your information

And screw you is a fancy way of saying screw over. Here is an example.

Blood mage got screwed over when the staff left a bug on the parasite energy drain which result in it draining 23 energy from anyone since the bug caps the drain at 150 energy.

and in this case if the assault bot was able to fully cleanse out debuffs it would be saying screw you to the person casting the debuff because they would never get a chance to use it if cleanse is used right after it.



dfo99 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 16:27:34)

mother 1

thanks. but the mana spent for debuff vs rage gained, damage dealt and 35% still looks unballanced, but is excessive annoying for some players.



Ranloth -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 16:34:48)

Looks imbalanced or is actually imbalanced? If you can't take advantage of it, that doesn't mean it's underpowered and needs an overkill buff.



Mother1 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 16:38:12)

Df099

A deuff is used mainly for it's effect while the other things you mentioned are just bonuses that comes with it.

if I wanted an attack that just did damage I would use strike since if you take away the energy cost of said debuff, and the effect then that is all you are truly left with.



dfo99 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 17:10:41)

trans

like i have sayed before this not is only about me and my build, i see alot of players using assault bot (sometimes with tank build) and prefer keep fight debuffed

mother1


bonus?? a 100% damage and rage gain is only bonus? if chairman's fury not hit 100% and unblocable, you think that will drain only 25% of rage? chairman's fury is a example of core that will be useless or extremly imbalaced if not hit nothing (like concurssive shot), the effective of all moves in epic duel include damage and rage gain and the situation of assault bot is the worse possible.



GearzHeadz -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 17:17:40)

What if you made its effect remove 65% of the debuff on you, and place 35% of the debuff on the enemy? Also buff the damage on that poor bot. It only deals 150 damage. Even the poison bots deal 170. The damage should at least be raised to 160.



dfo99 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 17:31:56)

GearzHeadz

no thanks. but (not happy) i agree 80% affecting necrosis, armor annihilator and all future things that debuff any atributes.



GearzHeadz -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 17:58:23)

You can agree on it but it'd never happen. The Devs said they won't make bots affect other bots. And they usually hold to their word on these. Even if the decision was backwards. At the least, I think this bot needs a damage buff.



dfo99 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 19:05:39)

GearzHeadz

the post that mother1 bring here was about azreal bot and before this bots that affect status, so with this new situation the can think about different



Teserve -> RE: assault bot buff (12/28/2013 19:15:24)

@above
I think the Devs will try for some consistency.



ValkyrieKnight -> RE: assault bot buff (12/31/2013 15:09:40)

I hate this ability to see each others robots, absolutely no one debuffs me in 1v1 now its near useless.



GearzHeadz -> RE: assault bot buff (12/31/2013 15:37:58)

Can still use it for damage. And if no one debuffs you it's like it keeps them in check. Kind of like when both you and your enemy both have drainers, but neither uses it first.



Mother1 -> RE: assault bot buff (12/31/2013 15:40:30)

@ valkrieknight

It is the same thing with me with the azreal borg. No one bothers to use buffs unless it is mineral armor, plasma armor, or hybrid armor.

But you should take that as a blessing since the person is going out of their way to avoid using debuffs for the fear of you removing 65% of it.



GearzHeadz -> RE: assault bot buff (1/2/2014 14:04:18)

I would actually buy this bot, if the damage was better.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.078125