Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Suggestions



Message

The berserker killer -> Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/29/2016 23:18:34)

In the games current state things like Demi-God, Eternal Legend, Epic Legend so on so forth aren't attainable. Im not talking about the playerbase, i'm talking about the fact that the battle mechanics aren't where they used to be.

Back then people could get 1k wins easily. Heck, back then NPCS counted towards 1v1 record. And so, now, what we have is practically an unattainable goal unless some changes are made.

The changes I would like to suggest is to cut the win requirement for each rank in half (starting with legend) while getting ride of grand emperor (hence making Legend at 50k wins) and to count 2v2 and 2v1 as 2 wins towards your rank.

This practically benefits everyone and will encourage the remaining players to keep playing



racing.lo.mas -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 0:02:36)

It's not that hard to do 1k wins.
You can do it in 1 week or less. So I dont support cutting the win requeriment.
But before your post I was thiking about counting 2v2 and 2v1 like 2 points. They are just longer than 1v1.
While you get 1 win in 2vs2/2vs1 you can do a few 1v1 battles. With a fast build you can do 4 wins while someone gets a 2vs2 win.
2vs2 are not similar than 1vs1, we see it in the rewards of the fight, the % of war drops, the old influence (5 for 1vs1, 15 for 2vs2, 10 for 2vs1).
I dont know why 2vs2 and jugg always counted as 1 win.



The berserker killer -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 0:05:27)

sure you can get 1k wins in a week. But that's 52k wins a year which is only 1/20th of whats needed to become a Demigod. that's 19 years down the line when we need to make a change right now if we want this game to even last 2 more years.

And yea, 2v2 and jug should definitely count as 2 wins and I don't understand why it counted as 1 either



racing.lo.mas -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 0:27:28)

Well high ranks are for old players. But you are right, at least the 2 last ranks are imposible to reach, there arent eternal legends or demigods.
I would support to make it (the last ranks) a bit easier to get. Well not much.
If i was comicalbiker (the one with most wins) what would make me keep playing? If I already get the demigod and there is nothing else to get?
I can support to take some wins. "As comicalbiker" having nothing to play or a rank impossible to get its practicaly the same.

Or better, just dont take those ranks. And make some new ranks between the ones we have now.
Example: Emperor needs 25k wins and Grand Emperor needs 50k wins. When you reach Emperor you have to do all you have done before just to get another rank.
So you can add a new rank between them. One who needs 35k.



The berserker killer -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 10:48:13)

quote:

having nothing to play or a rank impossible to get its practicaly the same.


That is, essentially, exactly my point. And this suggestion is just to halve legend, epic legend and demigod, instead of all ranks.



Exploding Penguin -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 13:30:30)

This seems completely pointless and unnecessary to me. NPC wins should have never counted toward this in the first place either.



The berserker killer -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 14:10:08)

Well it did. Idk why



racing.lo.mas -> RE: Cut ranks (emperor, etc) in half and (1/30/2016 18:40:52)

Adding new ranks is better I guess. The ranks you have mentioned will lose their rarity.



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.0625