8x -> RE: All-Time Rarity Leaderboards (1/2/2017 9:59:36)
|
I completely agree with what Satafou said. quote:
^ not really cause some people paid real money to earn that spot like nemesis30 buffy des n r0se etc... while others just wait for gifts to get there for free and then punish the ones who paid money to get there ? it's not a simple fix it's an unfair one. People spent plenty of money on war kills leaderboard and yet, that one was still removed. The point of leaderboards is to earn the top spot, not to buy it. Devs just love to repeat their past mistakes. For example, the current war system is almost exactly the same as the first frysteland war (except they put a limit of 50 war bombs per hour in the shop) and the personal influence leaderboard is now more or less the equivalent of the war kills leaderboard. The first time around, they realized what a major disaster the frysteland pay to win war was, but now there aren't enough high-rollers left to make it clear what a screw up the current war system is. Fame leaderboard was mentioned earlier, so I'd like to say a couple things about that. Fame has always been complete nonsense, a week after its release, it was clear that fame is a failed attempt at advertising. But, no. They felt the need to throw more fuel into that failure and add a daily leaderboard with achievement. And as if that's not enough, after years of fame beggars making everyone's experience bitter, the devs actually removed the ability for people who are actually famous to earn fame. One thing that should be kept in mind in a lot of situations is Quality over Quantity. Don't poop out bad content for the sake of making content. Don't make good features overcrowded with nonsense. If something is a complete failure, put it out of its misery. Don't even get me started on the code redeemers leaderboard... I guess I understand why they didn't feel the need to take any actions against the varium exploiters, but the least they could do, is remove them from all leaderboards, especially the P2W ones...
|
|
|
|