Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

RE: start punishing runners

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> RE: start punishing runners
Page 2 of 2<12
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
11/16/2011 19:40:50   
nico0las
Member

Supporting the new suggestion. Seems good.
Unfortunately, a DC is not necessarily the player's fault.
It should only apply should the other player close the tab/browser, or server list.
Then, it should say <player's name> Has left the battle, character in control of <You/other user>. Win will not be added.
For those who DCed, <Player name> Has DCed. Player in control of <You/other user.> Win will count regardless.

If a person server lists, they should be unable to enter battle until the battle ends, as a sort of punishment.

@Below Make a requirement for full equipment, excluding armor, and a level requirement as well.

< Message edited by nico0las -- 11/16/2011 20:55:23 >
MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 26
11/16/2011 20:52:59   
Jekyll
Member

My partner just ran in 2v2. Again. He was using an apprentice staff and nothing else. (1) He is a dummy (2) He didn't dare to play (3) He got DC'ed.

Going by (1), its against the rules, so ban him.
By (2), since he doesn't dare play, there is no need for him to play at all.
By (3), he shouldn't be playing with such a poor internet connection, it will just ruin more fights and make them unbalanced.

What should we do? Ban these people for 15-30 minutess, regardless of DC or no DC. I had enough. Of my 2v2 losses (329), I can guarantee that at least 75 of them are from running cowards. Another method is when it becomes a 1v2 situation, the 1 person should not get credited a loss, as it is not his fault at all.

_____________________________
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 27
11/17/2011 13:47:21   
State Alchemist
Member

as I am a lvl34, I am playing my non var alt once more (lvl 29). I notice people run if the battle wont favor them.

If it is OBVIOUS that people are bailing on purpose, ban them, don't keep giving benefit of doubt
Post #: 28
11/17/2011 13:53:06   
Remorse
Member

Wow drinde talk about stealing my past ideas e.e

Epic  Post #: 29
11/17/2011 19:18:08   
nico0las
Member

@State as I mentioned earlier, there's a difference between a battle not being in your favor, and it never being in your favor.
We learn from failure, true, but solid failure will get you nowhere.
1000 losses and 300 wins isn't exactly a solid record, and there are players (level 30s, mind you) with that record.
The problem isn't at the player level, but more so at the balance level.
First time I didn't blame the community. You're all welcome.
MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 30
11/17/2011 20:19:52   
rej
Member

Punishing the runners: no

NOT punishing the player left: yes.

2v2 fights in which your helper does not participate in should automaticly count as:
10 credits
10 experience
1 battle token
5 influnece (optional)
0 loses.

_____________________________

It is difficult to enjoy your cake when your pants are on fire.
~Dragon of Time
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 31
11/17/2011 22:13:37   
DatGuardian
Member
 

 After 5 times it is 15 miniuts to a hour then next 5 times it is half hour to 45 mins, should keep going up.
Post #: 32
11/18/2011 1:06:04   
drinde
Member

LoL, I didn't even know you had that idea, Remorse.

You can have all the credit, I just want fair battles. =3
DF MQ Epic  Post #: 33
11/18/2011 1:10:30   
ND Mallet
Legendary AK!!!


 @remorse Does it really matter who suggested it? It's not like everytime that the feature is used your name will flash across the screen saying that you suggested it. Also, as far as I know people have suggested controlling the character that ran way back in Beta on the old EDF. It's not like it's unique to anyone at this point.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 34
11/19/2011 1:51:41   
drinde
Member

Oh yeah, I forgot who, but this guy suggested this idea.

Matching players should be based on total amount of Stats, not LV ranges. A Max Difference of 20 Stats would be adequate, since 20 stat = 5 LVs.
DF MQ Epic  Post #: 35
11/19/2011 8:55:34   
Stabilis
Member

^ I don't understand that, is there a recognizable pattern for people with stats? As practically nobody will have the same build.
AQ Epic  Post #: 36
11/19/2011 12:48:36   
rej
Member

quote:

^ I don't understand that, is there a recognizable pattern for people with stats? As practically nobody will have the same build.

Yes. There is a very recognizable pattern. This is it: If you have more stats, you will probobly win.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 37
11/19/2011 14:40:17   
Stabilis
Member

^ Erm, stats being proportional to character level, would that not be the same idea as organization by level? I'm confused.
AQ Epic  Post #: 38
11/19/2011 21:25:04   
drinde
Member

^
A Non-Var LV34 may have the same stats as a completely Enhanced LV29.
DF MQ Epic  Post #: 39
11/19/2011 22:31:32   
Gepard Acht
Member

^heck a lvl 28 out-stated me , and just yesterday mir and i got to a fight with two fully enhanced lvl 34 Tlms and we all know who wins
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> RE: start punishing runners
Page 2 of 2<12
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition