Sir Night
Member
|
*sigh* It seems that people are becoming afraid to include stuns in their strategy even if they don't personally see it as cheap. I haven't been called cheap yet myself and stunning is not the main point in my build, but I guess I'll do something that I really don't want to do and give away some of the most glaring weaknesses in my build. Right now I don't have a heal, a way to restore energy, a way to get overly dodgy, or an instant 1 or 2 hit KO. It seems that if stunning a non-stunner is cheap, then using these strategies against someone who is not also using them is also cheap. No? I'm not saying that stuns aren't good, but the point of any build is to gain some sort of advantage over your opponent that will hopefully tilt the match in your favor. If a 'code of honor' is formed where stunning is essentially banned then who's to say what the next thing to go will be? Anything that's effective will eventually also get banned as being cheap.
< Message edited by Sir Night -- 11/26/2011 15:16:37 >
|