Count von Tilly
Member
|
Has anyone ever considered replacing TLM hybrid with a physical version of bloodshield? Physical bloodshield is more similar to hybrid armor than defense matrix is, and it is less powerful, giving TLM the true nerf it needs. Str builds would no longer have ultrahigh physical defense unless they waste a turn to activate it. but then there would be those pesky str BHs... I can anticipate the opposition, so I have made this counterargument: Will losing hybrid armor to phys bloodshield ruin the TLM? Of course not. If we are to compare TLM with TM: TM has 4 principle skills -reroute -malf -deadly aim: high power -assimilate: most efficient mp drain TLM has -reroute -smoke, which is better than malf due to less blocking -mini bloodlust(about 1/4 as effective as normal bloodlust) -poison grenade: the best poison in the game -surgical: more useful than supercharge I did not list artillery since it is likely to be less popular with all the support nerfs going on. TLM, with the skills listed, is already on par, if not above par, with techmage. With only those listed skills, TLM can function as well as TM can. Yet on top of this balanced skillset, TLM gets hybrid armor. And as we all know, hybrid armor is very powerful. It's a table-turning, no, table-flipping skill. Another argument: The original merc class got hybrid armor since the merc had no debuffs, giving it defensive capability to make up for its percieved lack of offense. Yet TLM has both hybrid armor AND the best debuff, giving it both offensive and defensive capabilities. They also somehow got reroute thrown into the deal, probably in exchange for bunker buster, but reroute is much more useful than bunker buster is to most players. Before you post something defending the TLM, please refute my argument. If you do not refute it in any manner at all when you make your assertion, then Everyone will know that you are trying to hide something.
|