Caststarter
Member
|
Even a DC class has to have some form of flaw otherwise even by DC standards it would be leaning towards being overpowered. With the defensive capabilities it has right now, giving much more offense would make it too powerful. I get that A) by normal expectations, fire is known to be raw destruction rather than being unkillable(Yet, phoenixes are very much a thing based more on the cycle of rebirth.) and B) it is odd to have a DC class not have a "good" offense(which pyromancer very much has bear in mind.), however that is more of a design choice from the staff themselves. KAA has the flaw of being the weakest on the defensive side and having gigantic mana costs(which many say to have more of an impact ever stats have been updated). By the logic of where having the least "flaws" means it is the "best", then Entrophy would be the best class out of the main three since it is the balanced specialization. Yet, due to the fact that players very much favor offense over defense, many said that KAA was the better class. In fact, did not many say they wanted more offense on even Entrophy? In which case... why give pyromancer more if Entrophy did not get that treatment? Which it is best said that it is because neither actually, in fact, needs it. Pyromancer certainly does not need have better offense. I honestly do believe it is equal in potential with Entrophy AND KAA. None are really so much better than the other. It really is a case of preference with the main free right now. Pyromancer is for those who wants perhaps the best defensive class in the game. And does what it is made to do, be the best defensively. It is same for KAA if one disregards DMK, it is the best offensively. Same for Entrophy. Best balanced class with many tools. To reiterate, Pyromancer does not need better offense. It really does not. With the mechanics right now, giving it more offense would mean it would be rather overpowered for what it is and just not fit around what the class revolves around.
|