Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

RE: =OS= Beta Release Thread 136 - READ THE FIRST POST

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [Oversoul] >> Oversoul General Discussion >> RE: =OS= Beta Release Thread 136 - READ THE FIRST POST
Page 15 of 30«<1314151617>»
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
12/12/2013 7:02:29   
legend knight
Member

@vagaran
Thx for the answer!
Post #: 351
12/12/2013 7:10:49   
Deathknight17
Member

Does $5 package unlock the void too?
AQW Epic  Post #: 352
12/12/2013 7:21:49   
JoelJ1998
Member

i think so...I hope so...ayeeeeeee
it states that players who buy Soul Gems in general so yeah it counts

< Message edited by JoelJ1998 -- 12/12/2013 7:22:28 >
DF AQW  Post #: 353
12/12/2013 7:26:31   
Deathknight17
Member

Then I should be getting the void, because I just bought a $5 package :) Can't wait
AQW Epic  Post #: 354
12/12/2013 7:36:11   
Megadragonknight
Member

@DeathKnight
Any SG package the player purchase is eligible to be 1st Upholder and automatically obtain 1stUpholderVoid for free. ;)
Post #: 355
12/12/2013 8:56:57   
DeathGuard
Member

I had like that if the 1st Upholder character is shadow element, he has a deck like this:
x2 200 Attack Cards
x4 500 Attack Cards
x2 500 Defend cards
x1 Sacrifice
x2 Life Drains
x2 Mark of Death or x1 MoD and 1 Poison.
x1 Shadow Fire(If he is a legendary character)*
x1 Empower

If Nulgath decides it should be a neutral/Shadow for any reason, I think I would like a deck like this:
x1 Neutralize
x2 Ironhide
x2 200 Attack Cards
x3 500 Attack Cards
x1 500 Defense Card
x1 Sacrifice
x2 Life Drains
x1 Shadow Fire(If he is a legendary character)*
x2 Mark of Death/Poison

Limiting myself to doing a small deck of 15 cards, so it doesn't have dead weight on its deck. Decks could be improve quite better but for a base I think it had suit.
Anyone is free to edit the decks and tweak it to their likeness, that way maybe we can suggest a deck we all think would suit better and show it to Nulgath.
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 356
12/12/2013 10:08:00   
JoelJ1998
Member

i feel like he should be shadow+neutral and have 20icewalls
DF AQW  Post #: 357
12/12/2013 15:37:43   
The Finnish Phoenix
Member

I feel like he should be Light+Neutral with 5 Neutralizes, 5 Corruptions, and 5 Greater Heals.
AQ DF MQ  Post #: 358
12/12/2013 17:13:50   
Andlu
Member

Fire/neutral or only fire Plox.
AQ DF AQW  Post #: 359
12/12/2013 17:17:40   
Blade5
Member

I'm not going to bother saying its chaos, I'll just wait and hope its a beta reward.
AQ DF AQW  Post #: 360
12/12/2013 17:34:16   
The Mango
Member

Now I only need 1 more lvl until I can use Templar! yay
AQW  Post #: 361
12/12/2013 18:14:58   
Kiazz
Member

:o What about a shadow-lightning?
x5 500 Attack
x2 Defend
x2 Poison
x1 Void Reflection
x2 Energize
x1 Electric Arc
x1 Chain Lightning

A non-standard 14 card deck would work just fine, considering its "special-ness."

@below But aren't there like, 3 neutral-shadows?

< Message edited by Kiazz -- 12/12/2013 18:55:12 >
Post #: 362
12/12/2013 18:28:21   
DeathGuard
Member

We got Cyber Void with that dual element, reason why people want Shadow + Neutral though it would be interesting if it was Shadow + Water.
Shadow + Water Deck:
x2 200 attack cards
x3 500 Attack Cards
x2 500 defend cards
x1 Life Drain
x1 Fresh Start
x2 Healing Spring
x1 Empower
x1 Sacrifice
x1 Shadow Fire
x1 Void Reflection

Could be nice to see if it actually worked out.
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 363
12/12/2013 18:32:53   
clintonian
Member

I was actually thinking shadow/water for that char cause of the orbs on his body plus its blue haha
PS: Deathguard where are you lolz

< Message edited by clintonian -- 12/12/2013 18:33:30 >
Post #: 364
12/12/2013 18:38:16   
The Mango
Member

Imagine its a lightning character! haha
AQW  Post #: 365
12/12/2013 18:53:29   
Kiazz
Member

Well lightning is also blue o,o
Plus, neutral-shadow doesn't allow a whole lot of options; neutralize plus some neutral card. The diiference in that deck would be the fact that it has 2 energizes and no super charge, cutting down the reliance on attack cards.
Fire-shadow? :>
x3 200 Attack
x3 500 Attack
x1 Sacrifice
x2 Defend
x2 Burn
x1 Fire Whirl
x1 Incinerate
x1 Meteorite
x1 Fireball
Post #: 366
12/12/2013 19:10:28   
DeathGuard
Member

Sadly it wouldn't work since there is no card that gives fire energy by discarding a card.
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 367
12/12/2013 19:13:12   
Kiazz
Member

Happily, it would work since there are costless shadow cards.

Edit: However, I'm not sure what you would consider a dual elemental; only ones with cards that give charges?

Editedit: So, are you saying that empower and sacrifice are not shadow cards? Despite their little orb at the corner being the symbol for darkness? And the fact that the wiki tags character with these particular characters as dual elemental? Plus their inherent nature, as in the effects of the cards themselves, being shadow-based, however objectively? Plus, like you said: how can fire not be the base? There's no charging card for fire, as of yet. I thought it was obvious.

< Message edited by Kiazz -- 12/12/2013 22:22:30 >
Post #: 368
12/12/2013 19:35:01   
DeathGuard
Member

I thought the attack cards were shadow since you didn't stated which one was the base, also it wouldn't really count as a dual since it is just 1 card from another element.

I think a dual element character could be define as a character that uses cards that require charges from two elements
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 369
12/12/2013 20:47:47   
the warden
Member

so we get that new void sometime next year or?
cant wait to get rev master tommorow though
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 370
12/12/2013 20:53:03   
DidYouKnowThat
Member

Eh. Personally I don't think he will receive a Character tree. He will be a Legendary, but that's about it.

I'm hoping he'd be a Water/Shadow- because not only would that be a really neat combo, but we haven't had much characters of that element. Furthermore,

It would really be a neat counterpart version of last year's Founder. Not only is it Shadow, but it also has a heal with Water.

I don't like the view of Fire/Shadow though. . . .I just plain don't like it, and it's too offensive anyway.

And for the 5-hit, a projectile from the Shield? Seems alright, but still. I'd rather have the Shield be some ''Sealing'' accessory or a ''Melee'' tool.

< Message edited by DidYouKnowThat -- 12/12/2013 20:54:22 >
Post #: 371
12/12/2013 21:27:06   
Andlu
Member

Just make it pure fire or fire/neutral D:
AQ DF AQW  Post #: 372
12/12/2013 21:33:10   
DidYouKnowThat
Member

No! Water/Shadow! :D

Boy, isn't this ironic? Fire and Water are opposites after all. :)
Post #: 373
12/12/2013 21:57:12   
Hendrik
Member

Massive shield implies massive defense. Iron hides and Void reflections would make most sense to me.

@Below: First upholder Void.

< Message edited by moroii -- 12/12/2013 22:07:10 >
AQ MQ AQW  Post #: 374
12/12/2013 22:04:20   
Andlu
Member

But he has a massive sword D:
So Fire(For sword offensive)/Neutral(for shield defensive) poof. Done D:
AQ DF AQW  Post #: 375
Page:   <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [Oversoul] >> Oversoul General Discussion >> RE: =OS= Beta Release Thread 136 - READ THE FIRST POST
Page 15 of 30«<1314151617>»
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition