Lord Machaar
Member
|
quote:
^ you still didn't give me a clear answer on how fair it is ?
Neither low rank and level 36 - 39 players facing high rank botters is fair. If there weren't botters in-game, we wouldn't be having an underdog mode right now, and we wouldn't be having this dilemma.
If you calculate luck chances your opponent earns by having +1 tech/supp/dex,
Deflection chance = 1/5 = 0.2% More chance to deflect. And by having +2 tech it's 0.4%.
Critical strike chance = 1/7.5 = 0.13% More chance to crit. When it's +2 support, it's 0.26%.
Block chance = 1/5 = 0.2% More chance to block. 0.4% when your opponent has 2 more dex.
Reference: http://forums2.battleon.com/f/tm.asp?m=22061908
+1 dex/tech/supp/str merely boosts your weapons damage or skills' damage in a minimal way, and it will be neglectable due to RNG. If you are going to blame your losses on such minimal numbers, when you lose by 400 - 500 - 600 HP, then that means you are just soothing yourself of a well deserved loss. Losers when they lose, they start looking for excuses to make themselves feel better, not for reasons to improve and alter their builds. As a PVP player, I learned how to adapt with different situations.
quote:
damage and 20 extra heal with minus 10 energy cost from cores fighting a rank 49 - 59 - 69 - 79 is fair in your opinion?
You make it sound like every player you face in PVP has these ranks. Give some names of good players that are using these ranks? And so if there are players using these ranks, few of them use builds that encounter yours, and few them play good. And also how many rank 49 players are there? Got any names? And between these rank 49 players, which one of them is smart enough to use his build, or uses a build that encounters yours. Asking for a buff because in 10% of your battles you face players with a slight advantage over you means that players with low ranks should quit the game since they are in disadvantage in 100% of their games.
Energy efficiency can be lethal, -10 energy will allow you to use different cores with less energy, azrael's will, frost shards, dread aux's special, that's minus 30 energy. You can tweak your build to be more efficient using energy efficiency, making it better than +1 dex/str/supp/tech in some cases.
Botters are like the people born with a silver spoon in their mouth, when the game gets a little bit hard for them, they start whinning. If you played PVP at lower ranks versus high rank NPC botters, you would know what unfair truly means. Crying because of +1 dex/tech/supp/str makes me laugh and shows how bottings NPCs make players weak.
I'm not the type of player who blame his losses on +1 dex/tech/supp/str, which is neglectable due to RNG. I've played games where I had way less advantage (Low ranks) and I still won. That's because I played PVP instead of botting NPCs, hence why I have a different way of thinking than you. When a botter earns fast ranks due to botting, it will look like it's unfair.
@Nowras:
You make it sound like 80% - 90% is a bad winning ratio. It is not and you are not meant to win every battle. The reason why enhancements were removed was clear, var players had way more advantage than non-var players, hence why some var players had 90% - 100% winning ratio. Why enhancements were removed? If devs were going to give certain players huge advantage, they wouldn't have removed enhancements, since enhancements did that, only players had to spend thousands of dollars on that. What players are doing now to have that winning ratio? Exactly, botting NPCS, which is quite funny. In this case, I'd rather keep enhancements since they benefit the game earning devs some $$$ to introduce features.
The thing is, high rank players used to have 80% - 90% + win ratio, in any game out there, that will never be the case. You name it, league of legends, FPS games, any game. Except for very skilled players who have played for years and years. Now it's funny when botters in ED are asking to have this winning ratio thanks to a PVP advantage, not earned by winning PVP battles or spending time on the game, but with cheating. Which is illogical. Players in other games spend hours and hours grinding, PVPing, and their winning ratio is way less than 70%.
Not even Legit players should have 90% - 80%.. If a player has that, it directly means tons of other players are having 30% - 40% - 50% - 60% winning ratios which is bad for the game. Now in order to give legit players an advantage to have a good winning ratio, which is their right, you will be also buffing botters, which will destroy the game.
quote:
While we ignored that he might have NPC'd after the daily limit, we also ignored power hours and power weekends and we also, ignored that he might have fought NPCs that give more than 9 EXP. So, in total it's fair and can be also better for him but, never worse.
It's like making a peace agreement with botters, bringing some of them down to a favorable rank. A band-aid won't help in this case, eradication is the key.
< Message edited by Lord Machaar -- 7/10/2016 14:52:37 >
|
Printable Version
Icon Legend
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread
