toopygoo
Member
|
quote:
Is that a failed attempt at trolling? 1) Why would you rob your partner? 2) It's per enemy your team (or you) kill. 3) Mind = blown. I'm not sure if I can take this seriously anymore, really. First I tried to raise a point, got some opinions back which is fair do but... this? It's going from serious to a joke, really. :I Its not less valid than any of your points about "logic" you're not really "robbing your partner" because you earned that kill. he still gets one for winning, right? you said you get tokens for winning? he got his, and you got yours? it sounds stupid right? That's cause i literally took your argument and put it in the negative.* besides the point. you said we need a combination of logic and balance: my proposition is that combination. right now its purely on"logic" (i am saying this in accordance to the arguments you have previously made), the balance would be rewarding players somewhat for getting A kill. same way as you get more credits and experience for killing 1 opponent, but not as much as if you killed two. exact same logic, and balance here. you get more than if you did nothing, be less than if you beat both. quote:
Tokens are a reward for winning the battle mode you choose not for beating person but still losing. this argument has been looked at from both sides and disregarded as far as i know, because neither came to a conclusion. *to put one's ideas in the "negative": to take someone's idea and give them -100% of what they are saying, meaning you you use their logic to provide a counterargument, which goes against their beliefs/goals. presented by Jules Verne first, arguing flying machines such as the designs of Da Vinci are fun to come up with, but impossible as are Digging devices and submersibles** (which were not invented yet in his time). **His example was disproven, i am aware so no need to point that out.
|