Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

CH are the lower class of mage?

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> CH are the lower class of mage?
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
10/21/2011 9:44:44   
Laufey
Member
 

 for me YES...

They did not have weapons of attack,they have only the multi-shot but it is too expensive for the damage it causes. as well as the plasma grenade is too expensive for the damage it causes.

In addition, there aren't suitable weapons,energy wrist blades are very few...it would take a blade-like claws frostbite but energy.
In addition, because EMP Granade LV 1 energy requires is 10, but is only 6 for Atom Smasher ?
Shadow arts is useless if you have high dexterity.

There will never be the CH that can compete with the TM and the mage until there will be considerable improvements ... for now I remain mage.


Sorry for google translate.


Nazgul
Post #: 1
10/21/2011 10:02:42   
Gepard Acht
Member

no, TM and CH fight in a dif way and why do you call it a lower class of mage?

first of all you dont need to use energy blades in CH ,any wep will do
emp needs a bit more ep cuz its unblocakble, and i say it one of the best/ most annoying move in the game
and SA will increase the chance of blocks and so will dex, its not useless to put SA when you have high dex, instead it gives better chance of blocking
And if I use your logic , mercs dont need high dex cuz of hybrid and BH dont need SA just when they have high dex, see how that doesnt make sense?

and thats so arrogant saying that
quote:

there will never be a CH that can never compete with the TM and the mage


I say that it depends on the people playin them and the build
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 2
10/21/2011 10:09:37   
Laufey
Member
 
quote:

first of all you dont need to use energy blades in CH


Why ? if I wanted to use the massacre with what I use it?
Post #: 3
10/21/2011 10:19:43   
PenyihiR
Member

Depends On The build..,
But When CH n TM using same stat , i think TM is better
MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 4
10/21/2011 10:22:21   
drinde
Member

If a CH has good enough Dexterity, the player can run circles around mages by Static Charging and Heal-Looping.

Plus, if used with a good strategy, CHs are devastating.
DF MQ Epic  Post #: 5
10/21/2011 10:23:31   
Gepard Acht
Member

you can stll use Physical blades , i even made a CH version of my BH build that is a high lvl massacre build
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 6
10/21/2011 10:32:14   
Laufey
Member
 

 there is no strategy devastating ... I've tried many strategies but the CH remain lower class...

Maybe just a strategy could be fine and that was with high support and high dex .. but when heal do not increases with support ... it has fallen dangerously ....

quote:

you can stll use Physical blades , i even made a CH version of my BH build that is a high lvl massacre build


then what is the Malfunction? only to decrease the smoke scrren?

Posts merge. Please don't double post. ~Mecha

< Message edited by Mecha Mario -- 10/21/2011 17:46:58 >
Post #: 7
10/21/2011 10:38:25   
Gepard Acht
Member


^ you dont even need to use it if you dont wanna, is there a rule saying that massacre needs some debuffing before use?
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 8
10/21/2011 10:44:49   
Laufey
Member
 

 The Auxiliaries weapon with high support is better of massacre with physical or energy wrist blade without malfunction....and no expansive energy
Post #: 9
10/21/2011 11:15:12   
TurkishIncubus
Member

i disagree

first of all
quote:

In addition, because EMP Granade LV 1 energy requires is 10, but is only 6 for Atom Smasher ?(thats because atom is blockable but emp is not)
Shadow arts is useless if you have high dexterity.(i think shadow art is useless if you use low dex :P, if you use high dex it almost guaranty blocking)


next...
CH has Massacre and Venom which are very different than TM skills also in my opinion Static Charge is better than reroute in every 2 turns it gives +20 energy :O

_____________________________
Epic  Post #: 10
10/21/2011 12:09:24   
Elf Priest JZaanu
Constructive!


 The Cyber Hunter is unique for skills like Static is unblockable or defendable. Just this alone, this skill can be used very effectively for a multitude of purposes. It is a fascinating class, and it is still new, so it will be still be developing by the players and staff.
AQW Epic  Post #: 11
10/21/2011 12:20:20   
Laufey
Member
 

 skill static is blockable

quote:

i disagree


why the CH are few?

Posts merge. Please don't double post. ~Mecha

< Message edited by Mecha Mario -- 10/21/2011 17:44:40 >
Post #: 12
10/21/2011 12:55:20   
Arcanis
Member

Because Tlm are many.
AQ MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 13
10/21/2011 12:58:46   
Laufey
Member
 

 since everyone here on the forum say that the CH are as strong as ever in ED are few? I'm missing something or those who say they have never been CH?
Post #: 14
10/21/2011 12:59:24   
EDBrainMaster2.0
Member
 

 Firstly, do NOT double post...
Secondly...there are reasons why CHs are a few.
People say TLM is OP with its new heal-looping build.
CH when NOT used correctly, is pathetic.

Btw, don't a lot of people say TMs are just about crippled since the heal nerf. Not saying i hate TM cos i was originally one before i turned to BM. I like both classes but for god's sake do not compare two different class...They have different strategies you know..
Post #: 15
10/21/2011 13:13:00   
I am Primal
Member
 

 well i'm ch and i get +80% win ratio in 2 vs 2 yes the class is weak but if you are a good player and can you the class it;s actually not bad but saying that it needs something like frenzy
Post #: 16
10/21/2011 13:22:39   
ur going to fail
Member

Lets see.. mage's have deadly aim, bludgeon and assimilation (major skills most TM's use). CH has the same stuff as TM, but traded out DA, bludgeon and assimilation for EMP, massacre, SA, and cheap shot. CH got the advantage skill wise, but at the cost of using strike more.
Epic  Post #: 17
10/21/2011 13:24:53   
Elf Priest JZaanu
Constructive!


 Interesting, I alway thought anytime the static skill is used, it returned energy back even-though though the attack could be blocked. My apology on my error in assuming it can't be blocked from return energy. It is a class I like, and if I did use this class, I know I could be effective with it in competing. Every person is different in their style of play, and within that, development of builds can progress or digress.
AQW Epic  Post #: 18
10/21/2011 16:29:23   
rej
Member

While ch's DO have many of the same abilities as mage, they often do not use similar strategies.

mages generaly lean either towards extreme support or a form of tank build. meanwhile, ch's also occasionaly use tank builds, but they more favor strengh abuse.

_____________________________

It is difficult to enjoy your cake when your pants are on fire.
~Dragon of Time
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 19
10/21/2011 16:52:34   
Algorithm
Member

Tech Mage is great.
Post #: 20
10/21/2011 21:30:27   
FrostHS
Banned


 Cyber is better by far. People don't think this because they have never been it, and never will due to the fact that i's 'UP'. Waaay off lol. I rarely lost before the nerf because heal helped me a lot but i still win about 90% of the time and i don't get beaten by mages so yea. Cyber is better.
AQW Epic  Post #: 21
10/21/2011 21:34:16   
Stabilis
Member

Its UP with shadow arts.

-a Cyber Hunter

_____________________________
AQ Epic  Post #: 22
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> CH are the lower class of mage?
Jump to:



Advertisement




Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition