Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

Do CH's need a buff?

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Balance >> Do CH's need a buff?
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
3/18/2013 16:38:14   
ansh0
Member

With all these SC threads popping up, ask yourself this.

Do you really think CH needs a buff?

It has:

Passive armor
Malf
EP regain
SA

I am not complaining, not flaming anyone and hopefully not breaking any rules.


Epic  Post #: 1
3/18/2013 16:54:54   
Mother1
Member

Personally I think CH is fine as it is.

The reason static topics keep popping up I believe is with all the balance changes happening and the staff saying they check the forums for idea their hope is that they will finally buff static to make it a ITO (In their opinion) a realible source of energy regain since the got several nerfs due to abuse and complaints.

Epic  Post #: 2
3/18/2013 19:23:22   
Wootz
Member

Yes, they do actually. Being a Cyber Hunter all this time, its hard to maintain anything good on it. The skills don't even synergize, it is purerly dependent on Plasma Armor, 5 focus doesn't even provide good durability. I gotta say, since the class was live this is the hardest time for it to be competitive.
AQW Epic  Post #: 3
3/18/2013 19:37:28   
Stabilis
Member

If only Plasma Armor was swapped for Energy Shield and Static Charge was a passive skill...

... ... !
AQ Epic  Post #: 4
3/18/2013 19:55:51   
Dual Thrusters
Member

Imo we need a new skil tree -_-
MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 5
3/18/2013 21:24:58   
Trifire
Member
 

 IMO, SA doesn't even fit in the skill tree and static charge is close to useless right now. They need something other than strength and support abuse. Honestly, they need static replaced for a shield and static replaced. Another thought is that they lower the percentages for static charge and bring it back as a passive.
Post #: 6
3/19/2013 5:29:43   
Wootz
Member

Swap Plasma Armour for Energy shield, Malfuncion for Conduction (one of Trans' ideas) and return Static Charge to its original state?

Pretty much with Static Charge is all the uniqueness on the class, making it passive both negates its own name and makes it unoriginal.
AQW Epic  Post #: 7
3/19/2013 10:35:23   
Stabilis
Member

You know what is picky of Static Charge? Strength-progression. Because it is an effective 0-cost skill revolving around energy, it can be considered a necessity for any Cyber Hunter. Then the problem is being a Cyber Hunter without Sttrength.
AQ Epic  Post #: 8
3/19/2013 10:36:51   
Blitzex/Sr. Zeph
Banned


 I dont see a problem with this class actually.

Im doing fine
Epic  Post #: 9
3/19/2013 11:40:16   
theholyfighter
Member

With the current amount of Skill points, you can't invest enough pts to make the listed skills op.
AQW Epic  Post #: 10
3/19/2013 12:56:57   
ansh0
Member

^10 in PA

7 in SA

3 in Malf


Rest is up to you.

Not UP from any angle.
Epic  Post #: 11
3/19/2013 13:29:34   
WolverineIsBack
Member

My 2cents say that keeping Plasma Armour is a good good idea, replacing it with a shield that isn't passive strikes me as a build plower. Static charge can be passive, and that will help buff it up.
Cheers

_____________________________

So I heard you like Epic Duel?

http://epicduel.artix.com/charpage.asp?id=wolverine%20is%20back
Epic  Post #: 12
3/19/2013 14:44:22   
ansh0
Member

quote:

Static charge can be passive, and that will help buff it up.


Then CH will be OP.

It's fine as it is, perhaps SA needs a rework(too powerful)
Epic  Post #: 13
3/19/2013 16:56:16   
Midnightsoul
Member

^Not exactly too powerful.
Shadow Arts is too unstable such as it can be useless at times and too powerful at other times.
I've made a couple suggestions such as a passive aux/bot boost.

I also think CH's do need a buff in static charge. Plus, you wouldn't have to be worried about CH's being OPed because they'd all end up investing in 3 moves with barely other skill points to put into other good moves.
DF AQW Epic  Post #: 14
3/19/2013 17:19:35   
Assassain11
Member

quote:

If only Plasma Armor was swapped for Energy Shield and Static Charge was a passive skill...


Wasn't Static Charge originally a passive skill when CH was released?

I might be mistaken.
Post #: 15
3/19/2013 17:30:17   
Wootz
Member

^ Nah, the skill was static back then with 55% Energy regein ignoring all defenses.
AQW Epic  Post #: 16
3/19/2013 17:52:22   
Midnightsoul
Member

I'm pretty sure it was 55% without ignoring defenses at first...then when it did ignore defenses, it was put down to 48%
DF AQW Epic  Post #: 17
3/19/2013 19:58:39   
Trifire
Member
 

 I think that static should be put as a passive again with half the percentages as now. Also I think that SA should be replaced with a skill that increases the defection chance.
Post #: 18
3/19/2013 20:02:51   
Ranloth
Banned


 Static Charge was never a passive. And it was said before, if SC becomes a passive then drop PA (it won't be leaving) or Malf. Either would make the class weaker, whilst EP regen isn't necessary for CHs to survive; other classes do well without Energy.
AQ Epic  Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Balance >> Do CH's need a buff?
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition