Jericho Fayne
Member
|
In A - Z of Stackable / Merge Items There is a reference for REALLY Special Dragon Chow One of the quests it lists as a location where you can get this awesome item is Bombing Run I'd like to add a little more detail about this. It appears that Bombing Run is your best bet for getting these items. Of all the location you can farm them from, this location has the shortest list of items. Also, from what I've seen, your skill at playing the mini-game determines the quality of prize you get. This is unconfirmed at present, but it appears that if you get a perfect score in the game (no failed missions), you chance to get the Super Dragon Chow is higher. Not only that, it's a very short game, allowing you to try over & over. Since most of us would like to have 1 of these per day to feed our trusty dragons, it's worth the time to check it out. For index updates and corrections, you need to PM the owner. You post here only if you have info about entries, not indexes. ;) If you were commenting on the item, then everything is like you said, unconfirmed. Shortest list of items doesn't improve your chance of getting the item you want. Here's an example by Artix, one that he used years ago in an old Design Notes entry to explain about the drops system. This is roughly what he said: You have a bag full of marbles. The bag is the quest, and the marbles are the items. Each time you finish the quest, is equal to putting your hand in the bag and taking out a marble. Once you take out one marble, that is win an item, you put it back. Meaning that the drop is still in the quest, and you have a chance of getting it again and again. So no matter how much you farm a quest, you have a chance of getting the same item thousands of times, and never getting one item at all. Okay, sorry for the long explanation. Just wanted to make sure you understood. I don't think we can add your information to the entry, too, because it must contain confirmed info about the item. ~PaperClip
< Message edited by PaperClip OF DOOM -- 5/9/2009 3:59:05 >
|