xxomegafaustxx
Member
|
@One Winged Angel1357 I totally agree with your rational thinking. And if I were in Cinderalla's situation, I would feel the same way too. I liked your analogy on the "Katana blade" reference to nonvarium players. If you haven't already, you may also read my analogies on the horse-cart-man analogy and the worm-bird analogy if you haven't done so already. Other than that, I would like to extend your analogy if you don't mind and nicely blend it in my arguments. Imagine this: It is the dawn and day of the samurai. The samurai in this story fight with courage, daunting bravery, skill and above all, honour. Japan is at peace when suddenly, the emperor challenges all the samurai to enter a dueling tournament to see which samurai is the best in the land. The samurai of Japan accept the challenge and they journey across many lands to fight and win the respect and deference of the Emperor. These samuarai are a greater analogy to the players of ED as the Emperor is the mere developer of the game who has inaugurated the challenge. But in the story, there are many different samurai. They have different ways of fighting, builds and also expertise to win sword battles as many were brought up or were taught their specific ways. However, the main difference lies in the fact of the weapon the samurai each carry as it varies amongst different samurai. There are those who wield the simple katana and fight with a single blade which is the least expensive, low grade in material and affordable if it breaks for the average Japan warrior. And there are those also who wield a single blade like the simple samurai but there blades have been sharpened by only the finest of wielders in Japan as granted by the Emperor making the duel favour their side as their blade is much more sharper than the simple samarai. No matter the weapon, each samurai upon battling each other uses their weapon, their skills and expertise to prove victor in the battle. The simple samurai who wields the least expensive sword can also compete healthily, with honour and equality with the samurai who has a sharper blade. This is the analogy for how the competition of nonvarium and varium users should be. But the samurai with the sharper blade finds that the battles are too long and competitive with the average samurai warrior. He wants to find an easy-way out to get the attention of the Emperor. It is this moment, instead of using his sharper blade, he finds a gun and uses it in battle. He decides to discard his traditional virtues of the sword and honours the gun as his weapon to make him a much more formidable foe. When the simple samurai challenges him to a fair and honourable duel, he is beaten greatly by the gun's unfair advantage over his sword. And as now, the formal samurai who has adopted the gun, cremates the whole population of sword users in the country of Japan. This analogy is what is happening currently. As the samurai of the sword faces this problem, he can only pray that the situation get better by holding his sword or adopting the gun. As the amount of honoured users of the sword diminish, the battle to win the Emperor's bet is only enlarged . The balance between each battle are highly imbalanced due to more using the gun as a quicker and effective alternative and more users to abuse it's powers. And slowly, the way of the samurai becomes another long forgotten history of the Japan culture. And for those who still find hope, it is found by the man carrying the sword. He is among a rare breed of honoured warriors who believe that honour, skill and equality should be valued in battle. And of course, the warrior with the gun won't admit this because it has given him a far greater advantage in the effort to win the Emperor's praise. But the flaw in the story exists the very challenging notion that the samurai who has adopted the gun has ultimately given up it's honorary virtues before. He has disowned his sword and disembarked and a journey that only causes destruction to his identity as a former samurai. And when he approaches the Emperor, he will find that he does not recognize him. He, after all the battles against the noble samurai, is regarded to be no longer a samurai but a western gunner. The Emperor can not give him the title of "being the best samurai of Japan" because no longer is he a samurai. The "Gunner", weeps and enraged, continues to abuse wielders of the sword only hoping to garner the attention of the Emperor. But that won't happen because no matter how hard he tries, he will still be regarded as a gunner. The only way he can change his identity to the Emperor is if he disowns his gun and brings his blade he threw a long time ago and faithfully use it to honor the battle between his foes. And is only then, will those who adopt the gun see the very flaw that stands in believing their is a definite end to short-cuts. They will see that ultimately, the option of adopting the gun was a grave one and and has led them to their shortcoming and doom. Whilst, the samurai with the sword may flee away from Japan, scared of the GUN, and never return back ever to see the Emperor or even have the confidence to win his praise. New samurai who take up the journey from lands away from Japan are discouraged because they themselves can't compete in the Atmosphere making the Emperor's challenge empty and the population of samurai to decrease over time. This is an analogy of the future of ED if we continue to embrace the GAP> So to cut to the chase, we to should NOT follow the samurai in the story. We must become the samurai before who used to compete healthily and see eachother's differences as a way to improve ourselves as players. I challenge you to become a samurai player in ED: Fight fairly, honestly and with integrity. Don't approve the GAP but lessen it. Take up the SWORD and fight with honour!
< Message edited by xxomegafaustxx -- 8/9/2011 18:24:19 >
|