Ranloth
Banned
|
quote:
It's not a democracy if only the forum community gets to decide. It's democracy when people refuse to voice their opinion by going onto Forum or tweeting their views to the Devs (or posting on FB). Those who don't bother are the same as the people who don't bother voting in real life, because "one vote won't make a difference". Also, majority often has awful ideas such as bringing enhancements back, reverting to old phases (literally, not just some features), etc. Minority often has constructive feedback and reasonable at that. If one doesn't bother with registering or being constructive, that's your loss. quote:
Flash is limited but bringing back losses would take 5 minutes and a server update. I am sure it's all that easy, but that's not really the point. It has a psychological effect on people too, because they aren't bothered as much about losing, because the record cannot be seen by others. Some players can go as far as abusing you over your record, just to boost their ego. It's not because "players wanted it gone" but there's plenty of other reasoning, covered by Mother1 already. Also, no, players shouldn't even have major say in terms of what gets implemented. We've seen the disaster called Legendary Mode, and plenty of bad balance suggestions, which have only made balance worse, not better - as some players claim "this will fix the game" and it does the exact opposite. New features? If they are good enough, they'll be on the "to-do list" but there are other priorities and there are two people coding everything, so it takes a lot of time. Hire more coders, eh? If AE was to expand ED's budget, sure. No one will code for a game, especially full-time, for free. It's a lot more difficult and time consuming than - for example - being an Artist.
|