RE: Anti-Merc Server (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

skr33ch -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (12/13/2010 22:56:29)

If anyone wants to know the so far Reign of OP Builds it goes like this

1: There were the Strength BHs way back when*
2: There were the Loopheal Mages which marked the end of the majority of Strength BHs (This Reign lasted a long time)**
3: Currently There are the Mercs, who are ruling with two OP builds at once, Strength Mercs (who can usually 2 turn a lot of people) and Support Mercs (who get rage and have to many attacks based on support.
4: To be determined (the order of life looks like BH should be next but who knows.

~Live, Adapt, Survive~

*Strength BHs have on fatal flaw, in order to attain high strength we must give up defence.
**The Reign of the Loopheals was ended by Agility, which subtracts defense.

[Skr33ch]



Cinderella -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (12/13/2010 23:08:03)

There are a few big problems here:

1: How much code would go into prohibiting a single class from a server?

2: what would happen if someone was on one of these servers and then changed class?

3: Doesn't this just serve to divide people who have latched on to their chosen class?



drinde -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (12/13/2010 23:37:47)

Agree with Turkish, nerfs would only make Mercs annoyed, buffs will make BH and TM happy.

Why not give an anti-server to each class?
An anti-Merc/Mage/BH server proly won't come out, but I want to be able to use one. :)






Mr.Pablo Jr. -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (12/14/2010 0:41:39)

quote:

A support happy merc can be shut down by well no one except the big man who holds all teh codes

I strongly disagree, an EMP bounty hunter can easily own one.



The Joker X -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (12/14/2010 3:02:42)

@above
Id have to disagree, they can still own a bh with their crit aux. And dont forget their rage! :)



Algorithm -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 10:39:19)

O_o



PivotalDisorder -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 11:06:57)

why did you dig up a completely irrelevant post from 2010 ?

and why did you edit your post, seems like a complete copout to post something "controversial" then panic and edit it out lol.



Algorithm -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 11:44:54)

Please don't ban me psibertus.



Algorithm -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 11:45:56)

ples don't ples i ned it for help and post bumb of dead.



Henry the cool -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 11:46:50)

I totally support this idea, although i wish it was not necessary.



PivotalDisorder -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 11:50:41)

@Algorithm: I am not staff haha

I was just mildly annoyed because I read through the topic and was confused why support mercs were still being complained about :P



Stabilis -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 12:08:37)

LOL who would have guessed Lectrix would express this sense of... "irritation". LOL!



Lord Nub -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 12:22:27)

Yeah Algorithm got the trolling thing down.

High five :D

Or should I say,

yeh Algorith gtohe toling tingdwn



Lycus -> RE: Anti-Merc Server (1/23/2012 12:38:50)

Please do not dig up topics that have long been dead, discussions like this now belong in the Balance Topic, so if you want to discuss anything like this further, then please go there. Since this is a very old topic, and it had no reason to be revived, then I'm going to lock it up.

~Lycus



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.078125