Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

He Who Lurks -> Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 16:42:09)

Alright, I've seen arguments about the Bunnyzooka set being the most powerful auxiliary, regardless of their damage due to the fact they have the most stat modifiers(currently) and I have an extremely different opinion about this. Bunnyzookas only deal 33+ damage and has 18 stat modifiers. Charfade's Bazooka deals 37+ damage and has 14+ stat modifiers. If being compared to Energy Bunnyzooka, Charfade's Bazooka only has 2 less stat modifiers in dexterity and support. 4+ damage can greatly change the tide of the game rather than 4+ extra stat points.Also, what about those without Energy Bunnyzooka? The only reason I see the set praised so much is for it's defensive stat modifiers(Energy Bunnyzooka). Which do you prefer and what's your opinion on this argument?



Atomic garden -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 16:44:57)

Damage.

Nuff said.[8D]



Master Volcon -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 16:46:38)

I have both and prefer bunnies. High damage only suits for high support builds. So basically its best to go high support with it.

High damage also can only attack once every 3 turns while the 18 stat bonus is always in effect. 4 less damage for ultimate builds??? Who wouldn't choose bunnies?



Shadronica -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 16:55:16)

Well said He Who Lurks. A very valid point you have made indeed.

I get cleaned up just as much by someone without the bunny zookas as I do from builds who have the bunny's. The damage done by Charfade's and Frost zookas well and truly match any bunny build.

I feel the players who do have the bunny zookas just have a bit more experience than the ones who weren't here at that time. So the players who have lost to players with Bunny Zookas blame the zookas and perhaps not their own inexperience.

I will admit that the bunnies give freedom to a build as long as you are not going to rely on using them.




edwardvulture -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 16:57:39)

Depends on how often you use them. If you have a dex, tech, or robot build, stays are more important.



goldslayer1 -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 17:03:25)

depends on the build.
and how much support.



Ashari -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 17:10:03)

It's not so much about their damage when you're using the BunnyZookas. You never see a support build with BunnyZookas. The builds that use it are builds that almost never use their Auxiliary attack in the first place: Strength Builds and occasionally robot builds.

If you actually plan on using your Auxiliary, then there are much better options than BunnyZookas.



Snaipera -> RE: Damage v. Stats: Which Prevails More Often? (4/8/2011 17:12:07)

It's stats , and here's why . Damage DOES not play every turn ,except for strength mercs . Stats , on the other hand , come into play each and every turn thus boosting your power a bit [:)]



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375