RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion



Message

Basicball -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:28:41)

Hooray =D

love it xD



Charfade -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:34:11)

@Andy123

What Ashari saying is true, its really only an additional bonus to have the frost destroyer weapons boost the baby yeti. We were going to leave it with just the frostbite ability but wanted to reward players who support our game if they both bought the yeti and frost Destroyer. Its really only a nice little additional treat. ^_^

@Basicball ^_^ glad someone picked up on the reference.




Remorse -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:40:52)

I agree and like the added yeti bonus,

Wat I dont not like is the nom nom abaialty being blockable,

Blocks these days are to game infulecing and when you dont get alot of rage from the attack it can be extremely unfair and as oftenas bad as a stun so in many cases blocked nom nom= a self casted stun.
and may result that skill ending a players life more then it saves them.

Another skill similar if atom smash that skill can also be blocked with no given rage and it is not very fair.

Either make these attacks give high rage when blocked but for the nom nom case it should be made unblockable.



Charfade -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:45:34)

@ Remorse


quote:

Wat I dont not like is the nom nom abaialty being blockable,


Personally me either. Maybe its the fact that I just want to get my yeti full and happy every time I click the button. XD But it was decided in testing that the Yeti was waaaay to over powered unless it was blockable. T_T And it did kinda own.



Digital X -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:48:40)

Now that there are two Hanks, one at his shop and one at Frysteland, is it his Brother? ;) Or clones?



razackie -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:50:24)

Perhaps he travels with you?



Charfade -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:51:09)

@Digital X

Hank has an evil holiday bro! Oh nose!... must be right?



Digital X -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 9:55:05)

Well, i think we can let him off being evil just this once, as he does sell some pretty nifty gear!



Stabilis -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 10:22:26)

@Charfade,

Would you say having the yeti special:
-recharge over time
-be blockable
-cancel projectiles
-cause frostbite

Altogether be balanced?

Seems like quite a package!

Or was one of my points invalid?



One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 11:56:36)

@Charfade not sure how many people hear know what Klingon is and im not sure if the ED system could even handle that, but that would be pretty epic if that was a choice for language



Basicball -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 12:30:39)

who wouldn't know what it is?

i tried learning it last year, but there's just no good manuals :'(



One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 13:44:41)

BB there are a bunch of kids that play ED i think it is a bit older then them now their parents may be a different story



Sparticus -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 14:01:21)

quote:

qatlh 'oH SoH muStaH Daq tlhIngan. 'oH SoH ja'taH jIH qan vaD yajtaHghach tlhIngan. SoH 'oH targ. DaHjaj 'oH QaQ jaj Daq Hegh!



Since this is an English only forum I'll be happy to translate. "Why are you making fun of me for knowing Klingon, are you calling me old or something? You are a Klingon pig and today is a good day to die!"

We get the joke Charfade, thanks. [:D]



One Winged Angel1357 -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 14:06:14)

And the win goes to Sparticus



Basicball -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 14:06:19)

everyone should watch star trek :p

according to the EDMU statistics,
91.8% of people playing ED (watching our vids) are male, and 8.2% are female.

Male:

Age * % of male viewers

13-17 * 56.4%
18-24 * 11.9%
25-34 * 8.8%
35-44 * 5.5%
45-54 * 13.1%
55-64 * 2.5%
65+ * 1.9%


Female:

Age * % of female viewers

13-17 * 42.7%
18-24 * 14.6%
25-34 * 4.9%
35-44 * 4.9%
45-54 * 12.2%
55-64 * 9.2%
65+ * 11.0%

Conclusion: people're old enough to know Klingon :p



Elf Priest JZaanu -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 16:16:47)

The Original Star Trek series was iconic and progressive in bringing a type of television that was nonexistent before its time.

Here are some fun facts.

Lucille Ball was the one who approved Star Trek and had the show be produced by Desilu® Studios.


Martin Luther King felt Star Trek was extremely important during the American Civil Rights Movement.
http://voices.yahoo.com/why-martin-luther-king-jr-felt-gene-roddenberrys-star-3784964.html



Basicball -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 16:31:05)

maH voq Hay'chu' !

yes, yes we do



prince t3k -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 17:40:13)

When will the next update ?



Wraith -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 17:41:44)

^Uh, considering it's only been a few days since the last one, you should'nt be asking for too much.

Anyways, it'll be out at Ready O'Clock on ReadyDay, Readyober/Readyruary, 20Ready.



Stabilis -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 18:56:19)

@prince t3k,

Ask the developers on their twitters for good answers,

Titan's Ac

Nightwraith's Ac

Charfade's Ac

Cinderella's Ac



Remorse -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 22:31:13)

@Charfade

I understand how the yeti has the potential to be oped,

As an unlitmed amount of nom noms during a battle means that and oppennet can stall an auxialry attack for up to 9 TURNS :O

However it already has an amount limit per game of one, so why is it blockable aswell??


My guess is that from the dicovery of it being oped through testing. Both limted turn of one, and making it blockable were added at the same time.

Perhaps testing the bot with only a limit of one per turn as it is but unblockable,
I think it will make the bot much more appealing and less likely to let you down and make you lose.
Also we lead me into wanting to buy this robot and Im sure many others may be more inclined to buy it if it wasnt so dangerous to use block wise.



drinde -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 22:32:29)

^
How about if it was blocked, it only NOMs either the Auxiliary or the Gun, not both?



Remorse -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 22:46:16)

^ WOuld be alot more difficult to add I supose it could be done, but their is simply no reason for it to be blockable in the first place if its limited to once per game.



ND Mallet -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 23:01:23)

@Remorse Chances are they probably tested making it unblockable but only useable once. As it stands, it can only Nom once if it hits so it wouldn't be different since they tested having it unblockable. I thought I read that you can use the Nom again if it gets blocked though



Remorse -> RE: =ED= December 02, 2011 Frosty Destruction! (12/4/2011 23:06:41)

^ yes you can but being blocked you have to wait another three turns, and 6 turn if you wanna use the robot to attack seems a bit unfair to me.


So in a way having this moved blocked is worse then a stun, because it brings next to nothing in rage but also sends your robot into cool down when it may of been a source of attack.



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.09375