Resk -> RE: =OS= Beta Release Thread 130 - READ THE FIRST POST (8/31/2013 18:01:24)
|
To give a basis for my stance, I'll start with an explanation, I work in a gaming shop, which has weekly tournaments, and of the 30+ players that enter each event, the winners are always among a small group of 5-6 of them. If they have put the effort & skill & time into the contest, I feel it is fair that they are rewarded for it, and that in turn, it promotes the players that lose to learn from their past mistakes, improve upon it through learning from others. If you lose because you are worse, it's hardly the other persons fault for putting in more time to learn the skills needed. I haven't won one of these, but if someone else feels that they would rather vote for someone who has won multiple times due to them -being good at what they do- then I'll just have to keep trying until I reach a level to compete with them, if they vote because of biass towards that particular person, ofc that will annoy me a little, but with the number of votes, that shouldn't be too much of an issue for individual entry's. If there was a way to have each one done anon' until the end of voting, that would be nice though... -Resk
|
|
|
|