Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

RE: Seriously Fix 2 v 2

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> RE: Seriously Fix 2 v 2
Page 3 of 6«<12345>»
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
8/6/2011 15:01:58   
DeathSpawn
Banned
quote:

I've seen your posts and it's clear you don't want change,but there are MANY more who do.If luna,miraged,morrigan,new hope,even angels holocaust and many more 2vs2 champs say 2vs2 is unbalanced and needs fixing then it's actually you bashing our wishes.


Nothing wrong with creating a new game mode.

Just stop spamming the idea of ruining the current one. Also why would you name names that are horrible players? Button mashing and dummying doesn't make a good player. Everyone will have their own opinions on that. Also you name your friends?

This isn't a popularity contest. Face it 2v2 is everything it was meant to be. If your unhappy with it then introduce a new game mode possibly with the ally link feature.

I'll tell it how it is every time. I'm not here to be Mr. Popular like some of you.

< Message edited by DeathSpawn -- 8/6/2011 15:03:57 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 51
8/6/2011 15:36:03   
.Sir Lazarus.
Member

I just posted one post about having two 2v2 fights last 45 minutes and it got misteriously deleted. Yea im quiting for the time... My regards to everyone

This forums is working on a Comunism based system. Shut up or be shuted... Cya guys

_____________________________
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 52
8/6/2011 15:38:58   
DeathSpawn
Banned


 ^ Yep agreed Lazarus.

The 45 minute thing is a lag issue though which is affecting all modes of play. Find something else to do today and try again tomorrow since Titan is apparently working on the issue today.
AQW Epic  Post #: 53
8/6/2011 15:54:17   
Midnightsoul
Member

the lvl range for all modes besides jugg should be 3 lvls different
DF AQW Epic  Post #: 54
8/6/2011 19:16:17   
IsaiahtheMage
Member

@DeathSpawn Because we arent making ideas for a new game mode where making ideas to imrpove 2 vs 2 their is clearly somethign wrong with 2 vs 2. Such as MASSIVE lag attacks and total imbalance. Understand most players dont want imabalance and lag in 2 vs 2. Also by calling her friends horrible players. Your just flaming now.
AQW Epic  Post #: 55
8/6/2011 19:19:59   
DeathSpawn
Banned


 Whoa whoa whoa hold up there broski!

I'm down for getting rid of lag. That's not a 2v2 problem bud that's a gamewide problem.

To add something such as ally link to 2v2 would completely change the mode all together and thus should be a new mode.

There are many players that love the randomness of 2v2 as it stands. Also what chance would a 28 non-varium kid have in a fight against a pro with two 33 full varium accounts teamed up? That's not fair for the other players.

I'm down for ally link just not in the current 2v2. Make it a new mode. I've got no problem fighting 2 full 33 variums with a 28 kid because we'll still own you fools and that's the way it is :)

@Below,

Problem with that is a system glitch. A ton of times the player canceled and that's why it appears they ran or disconnected before the battle started. Yet another problem with 2v2 since your chance of winning goes down tremendously after something like that.

If that ever gets fixed and the 2-4 turn buff - debuff glitches along with turn skips and the black screen of death then 2v2 mode will be just fine.


< Message edited by DeathSpawn -- 8/6/2011 19:31:33 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 56
8/6/2011 19:26:34   
edwardvulture
Member

The running makes me mad. Other than that its an ok battle mode.
AQ DF MQ  Post #: 57
8/6/2011 19:31:10   
IsaiahtheMage
Member

@DeathSpawn You did have a good point about the ally link. But 2 vs 2 still needs level range fixing.
AQW Epic  Post #: 58
8/6/2011 21:26:52   
MirageD
Member

quote:

Just stop spamming the idea of ruining the current one. Also why would you name names that are horrible players? Button mashing and dummying doesn't make a good player. Everyone will have their own opinions on that. Also you name your friends?

This isn't a popularity contest. Face it 2v2 is everything it was meant to be. If your unhappy with it then introduce a new game mode possibly with the ally link feature.


lol....who the h*** are you??? i don't button mash and neither does hope, morri , luna or anyone else on the 2v2 board......we have worked hard in a very difficult battle mode.....try it some time and i'll see you on the board when you get the hang of it
AQW Epic  Post #: 59
8/6/2011 21:39:22   
DeathGuard
Member

LOL I have miss the fun of this and mirage 1k cookies for you
On topic: 2 vs 2 have evolved, but in a bad way, it seems balance, lvl difference, nonvarium/varium gap had ruined it, and lag is the worst.
Guys coming here saying it is fine is becuase they think everything is perfect or because they used the oped class. Get some cream to masage your chest little dummies
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 60
8/6/2011 21:48:24   
redxtra
Member

yea in 2v2 u could be lvl 33
opponents are lvl 28s and ur mate is lvl 23
its possible to win (and atleast u get i bunch of exp and creds) but its the fact u have to play like ur usin 2ppl as \ur mate is weak to the others and what most ppl do in 2v2 (well lower lvls) is go after the strongest so u have to buff urself majorly and hope ur mate can heal ya
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 61
8/6/2011 23:24:09   
.Sir Lazarus.
Member

@ allmost everyone

Dont make a favor to mods and flame each others. Talk about the problem, not each other.

I think lowering down the level difference is ok but not in a 3 level range, cause finding a 2v2 battle is sometimes too hard as it is. I think it should make a sum of both levels and than make a difference by, lets say 8 or 7. So in that case the worst thing would be 33&33 vs 29&29 or 33&33 vs 29&30.

Maybe linking should be only for 4 players, so some friends can have a match between themselfs. Or you dont have to be a friend with everyone, only one, and if 4 players make a chain like 1-1-1-1 when they press 2v2 they will face each other. Donno

< Message edited by .Sir Lazarus. -- 8/7/2011 6:34:35 >

_____________________________
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 62
8/7/2011 0:42:15   
Minus123
Member

Well, someone posted above that a big reason for the outrageous lag in 2 vs 2 is because if Im in California, and I'm playing against a kid in egypt, theres most likely going to be turn skipping going on.

Maybe There should be a system that links battles between players who are relatively close, so not that much lag will be going on. Because Im really beggining to get sick of this lag. Had a match yesterday with luna, and I dc'd right before she killed the dude
Post #: 63
8/7/2011 1:32:09   
DeathSpawn
Banned


 @Minus, Nah it was a server issue that Titan was battling all day. He posted a couple times on Twitter.

@Lazarus, Which game mode you talking about? That one doesn't exist lol.

quote:

33&33 vs 29&29 or 33&33 vs 29&30.


Read that again :P

Also linking should be a new game mode considering it changes every aspect of team battles. Maybe a new button labeled Ally Battle?

@Miraged, 19345 wins and 8291 losses isn't button mashing? let me say that again...8291 losses.....That's the definition of button mashing.

My point was to Callisto who thinks players that can beat up on the noobs, and not win in an unfavorable position, opinions weigh more than anyone elses.

quote:

lol....who the h*** are you???
quote:

try it some time and i'll see you on the board when you get the hang of it


Yeah 9380 wins and 1903 losses 83.13% Win rate. Think I may have the hang of it but maybe I should learn from the best....8291...70% win rate....lol

But hey I love the spirit and I'll see you guys very soon xD
AQW Epic  Post #: 64
8/7/2011 1:34:36   
drinde
Member

The horror... the horror. I can't get three 2v2s without getting stuck with a Noob at least once. At least randomly select someone from the Player Database and let the Player control both Characters.
DF MQ Epic  Post #: 65
8/7/2011 1:37:45   
goldslayer1
Member

@death
well death comical biker has like 14k losses
that doesn't make him a button masher since he's almost 91% in 1 vs 1 with the most wins out of anyone else.
not to mention wiseman told me that comical has 5 commander accounts.

u can have as many losses as u want as long as u have the decent amount of wins.
AQW Epic  Post #: 66
8/7/2011 1:39:12   
DeathSpawn
Banned


 Wow Gold you proved my point like always without realizing it :)

@Below

You don't understand how a ratio works? Sorry bro don't have time to explain the basics xD

Edit: A button masher is one with tons of wins and losses. Over time your bound to win a match in 2v2 by fighting noobs. If you have a bad ratio with a ton of wins then your showing you can't win in a tough spot whereas others have. Having more wins isn't what makes a good player. Peeps can complain they always get the noobs or complain about whatever they want but regardless, others are put in that SAME situation and came through with the victory making that player far better at the game.

< Message edited by DeathSpawn -- 8/7/2011 2:39:49 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 67
8/7/2011 1:40:09   
goldslayer1
Member

@death
so u expect someone to 150k wins in 1 vs 1 while maintaining their losses below 2k?
how dumb are u?

i know how ratio works.
the more wins he gets and stays on the same ratio it means he's obviously getting losses.
if comical did have 2k losses his ratio would be 98.7% and i doubt he could get it at the speed he plays because it would require tons of NPCing and slow fighting


are u referring to button masher as players who play alot or those who get low %?

< Message edited by goldslayer1 -- 8/7/2011 1:53:33 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 68
8/7/2011 4:46:50   
Callisto
Member

@DeathSpawn you either don't get this topic at all or you just really don't see a problem...

Let me quote Buffy from one of previous 2vs2 balance threads:

An Example Of The Recurring Problem:

I'm Doing 2vs2 On An Alt... A Level 33 Merc.

I'm Standing Next To My Partner, A Level 28 Mage, Equipped With Only A Staff.

We Are Facing 2 Level 33 Tac Mercs, Full Varium, Fully Enhanced.

Now, We All Like A Challenge, But I Had No Chance Of Winning, Seriously.

That right there,says it all.I'm not asking for much,all I want is for lvl gap to be lowered to 3 instead of 5.Not new battle mode,not ally link,nothing complicated.

As for calling my friends,best 2vs2 players of all time horrible???...You're only making yourself look like a fool.Their ''lower'' win ratio is exactly because of imbalance,they weren't always OP class.Miraged for example has been bh,mage,merc and tac merc.Morrigan as well,they've seen it all.You dare to call them horrible??That just makes me laugh.

And also,like I said in one of my previous posts...If 90% will say 2vs2 is unbalanced and unfair and needs fixing,it's a fact.No matter what 1 person says,since you seem to be only one who thinks it's all perfect,it won't change the fact it needs fixing.



< Message edited by Callisto -- 8/7/2011 5:31:22 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 69
8/7/2011 5:06:48   
Ashari
Inconceivable!


 Let's get back on topic everyone. I know the recent lag was a major problem, but it was something that affected the whole game, not just 2v2. The hotfix on Saturday should have helped the ease the lag quite a bit and Titan's continually working on improving performance.


I see the problem with the 5 level range in 2v2 as well as 1v1 but I think it stems deeper than just that. Decreasing the level range would be a temporary solution at best since you'd still be at a huge disadvantage even with a level 30. Encumbrance can only do so much when the large majority of leveling players are starved for credits. Even though they can get the same equipment as a level 33, almost none can afford it at level 28. It's pretty clear that players need some more leniency with their credits at all levels.

Balance wise 2v2 is still dominated by Mercs and Tactical Mercs. Artillery Strike was just one of the reasons that next weeks balance update will correct and hopefully the rest of the changes will help even out the classes in both battle modes.

Anyway, looking for an 90% win ratio in 2v2 is not realistic. 1v1 ratios are heavily inflated by NPCs and fighting low level characters. Since there are 4 players instead of 2 involved, the chance for a large level difference is reduced. A mode is not unbalanced just because you can't always win.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 70
8/7/2011 6:15:12   
raingurl
Member

Dear Death Spawn,

I find it hilarious that you are so desperate for attention that you would flame good honest players. You do not know me, or miraged, or hope, yet you are telling people we cheated? I do realize your desperation to be good is large, but it will do you no good to put us down. You see we have proven ourselves, just check leaderboards.I'm with miraged, when you become a big boy and you can prove how good you are by getting your name on the rank with ours. And seeing as how oppps your name isn't there, you'd do better to talk to us when you actually become as good as we are, till then , keep up the good work little buddy! Ive been playing this game for a long long time, 2v2 was unbalanced then, and it still is today. I rarely ever speak or complain, but i feel i have to defend myself and my friends who I know for a fact don't cheat, just because you are sooo obviously jealous of us , doesnt make you better it makes you look well, desperate. Thanks for your time.

Morrigan
AQ DF  Post #: 71
8/7/2011 6:36:44   
.Sir Lazarus.
Member

Deathspawn.... That numbers represent levels. You realy are slow right?
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 72
8/7/2011 7:56:38   
I am Primal
Member
 

 well deathspawn what can i say,

you have insulted quite afew of the all time 2 vs 2 players
u may have an 83% win or whatever but remember this you had varium from the start of this game many people in all time 2 vs 2 didn't get it till later on in the game.
i for one got varium at lvl 31 and have almost 75% win and you may think your better than me becuase you are an op tat merc but try getting +80% as every class in 2 vs 2 leaderboards try not being the op class to get your record high i have been bh mage and merc and all the new classes too and well maybe you should try getting your 83% ratio as them. And i'll give you a hint don't bother to act like you know it all becuase really u don't. And everyone knows you don't.

Post #: 73
8/7/2011 8:00:16   
dj.sammy.b
Member
 

 Death Spawn,

I think you need to shut your mouth. How dare you make a mockery of the hard work and determination that all the top 2v2 players have put into this game? They are the pioneers of Epicduel, without them Epicduel wouldn't exist. They've been playing Epicduel before you were even toilet trained, so don't you dare think you can come in here and speak disgusting, twisted words about my friends. And how dare you say that you have the highest ratio of wins in 2v2. I highly doubt you are even level 33, and if you are, how about we sort this out in a true battle then, huh?
Post #: 74
8/7/2011 9:15:52   
PivotalDisorder
Member

did some little ED cult have a secret meeting and decide to rain down fury on Deathspawn ? ^^

3 people logged in to reply, and they have a total of 7 posts between them, 3 of which are in this topic.

_____________________________
Post #: 75
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> RE: Seriously Fix 2 v 2
Page 3 of 6«<12345>»
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition