Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

RE: =ED= Balance Discussions

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> RE: =ED= Balance Discussions
Page 13 of 30«<1112131415>»
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
9/3/2011 23:40:34   
Lord Nub
Member

^
Then your faced with all str TaM's as why would anyone use support? Also Arty doesn't ignore def if that's your reference btw.

The issue is the fact that TaM has two Uber passive abilities. Lets start by taking out reroute and replacing with anything that doesn't give them more energy and see where that takes us.
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 301
9/3/2011 23:55:20   
Giras Wolfe
Member

^Tactical Merc doesn't really have that many support based skills, but Field Medic and Artillery Strike combined with Hybrid Armor and Reroute is almost unstoppable.
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 302
9/4/2011 0:02:17   
Joe10112
Member

Lord Nub, how about we replace it with Assimilation? That is better.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 303
9/4/2011 9:08:16   
redxtra
Member

like all is needed is to have a good strategy for it
but i do agree that hybrid + reroute is too much for one class
im saying take away hybrid and replace it with defense matrix since they already have technician
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 304
9/4/2011 9:32:47   
Stabilis
Member

^ That's more mage-like
AQ Epic  Post #: 305
9/4/2011 10:06:00   
Lord Nub
Member

They have atom smasher. Why get Assimilation to? The route of all evil is reroute which should be mage specific, hence the name "Mage" and they should have more energy than assassins (BH), or Warriors (Merc).

There's two builds that just work with TaM and that's Str and Sup. Peeps may argue otherwise and say there the greatest thing since sliced bread but when you look at win/loss that's how it is. Both builds use both of these super abilities to the utmost of their abilities.

It allows a support spammer to sit back and heal while waiting for arty energy and aux. Over time sup abusers with lvl 1 heal are increasing their energy and hybrid makes it that much easier to sit back and relax along with the fact they have a high deflection chance which is another great perk of support.

Strength is just complimented like crazy with this tree. Reroute allows you to spam the low costing skills like double strike, maul, and frenzy repeatedly. They also have smoke which lowers their opponents block chance and if that opponent bots, they essentially bought themselves another hit.

In all reroute and hybrid just work out together far too well. I don't understand how this is so hard to see....Every class revolves around its own passive. Mage = Reroute, BH = BloodLust, Merc = Hybrid, BloodMage = BloodLust, Cyber Hunter = basically static charge although it's not passive it has its own strategy considering as long as you hit, you will never run out of energy, and TaM - Reroute AND Hybrid?!?!?!?!? Did anyone think that one through a bit?

I'm sure everyone can agree that a class without the passive i mentioned would be an absolute garbage build. Take away reroute already and leave that where it belongs, Mage. TaM only obtained 1 BH skill and that's smoke so I would say something needs to be picked there. Either replace Hybrid altogether with shadow arts or reroute. That way there not losing a passive and they will still be very formidable. There's many other things that could be done also but that would require restructuring the skill tree further and this appears the easiest way to change one thing. In no way should 1 class have two of the dominating abilities of the game while the others have one.

@Red two posts above,

Wouldn't work man imagine a support build then! Also like the other dude said too mage like.

@Sparticus below,

I enjoy the heal as that takes away a bit of the luck factor. If you have a high support build and get crit and deflected what are you to do? Heal of course and try again. Without heal your limited to your choices and every match would literally be 2-3 turns.

Also everyone would be a strength build. I think we know what happens when everyone uses the same class and build....makes for a jacked up flash game....

@Tigura,

This isn't about whether or not somethings beatable. Everything is beatable but there's less diversity because one class has a superior advantage to the others.
















< Message edited by Lord Nub -- 9/4/2011 11:58:07 >
AQ AQW Epic  Post #: 306
9/4/2011 10:16:40   
Sparticus
Member

First, my bad , AS does not ignore def but for some reason I thought it did?

Reroute needs to go for TlM, Field Medic needs to get a nerf period. No more healing, this is a PvP game, its not supposed to last 10 minutes a battle.

The flow of the game is diminished when any class can hold you in a battle that long, regardless of who wins. It was that way for mages and they were nerfed big times. Afterwards the game really started to pick up, battles really were fun and players were enjoying themselves again.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 307
9/4/2011 10:20:38   
Dendavex
Member

You guys are wrong I know (Un)Tactical Mercenary is Over powered but I think all classes should be like it if all class were like this wouldn't you love the game ?
Epic  Post #: 308
9/4/2011 10:24:37   
Stabilis
Member

We need to trade Cyber Hunter's Shadow Arts for another passive. ITS OK THAT WE ONLY HAVE 1 PASSIVE SKILL. But if we do we would please appreciate a different passive. Shadow arts is weak by itself and demands that you have high dexterity!!!

Instead could we have reroute, deadly aim, or an energy form of hybrid armour?
AQ Epic  Post #: 309
9/4/2011 10:27:55   
Dendavex
Member

@GreenRain13 I got an idea for a new passive for cyber hunter
Cyber slice it will increase bazooka damage almost like deadly aim..
improves with nothing it just scales levels and it can replace shadow arts
Epic  Post #: 310
9/4/2011 10:30:28   
Stabilis
Member

^ That's alright for a skill, but that means I won't be using my gun at all then . I still like your suggestion and vote to change shadow arts though.
AQ Epic  Post #: 311
9/4/2011 11:12:12   
od
Member

@greenrain
Or just buff static charge so it's as powerful as the 3 superpassives

I think the problem with Tlm is not just reroute, it's also frenzy which in my opinion is stronger than the 2 secondary passives.

< Message edited by od -- 9/4/2011 11:14:06 >
Epic  Post #: 312
9/4/2011 11:19:32   
tigura
Member

I have found that supp tlms are very good and if you dont have the right build, are OPed. However, there is a way to beat them :) TLMs rely on their support. But they also rely heavily on the fact that reroute allows them to heal multiple times. So if you take away their energy while staying alive (big heals) you can beat them. My strategy involves keeping the supp TLM at max. 14 energy and looping like crazy. As a TM, I find that because supp TLMs do so little damage when they arent auxing, heal looping is not hard. Especially when you are using a lvl 9 assim. Assim is actually the key to my build, and despite having 112 supp, I use it more than my aux. Keeping the TLMs energy down is not hard after they have used art strike. If you can keep taking away energy, and keep healing, then you can beat these guys.

< Message edited by tigura -- 9/4/2011 11:27:36 >
DF Epic  Post #: 313
9/4/2011 11:25:55   
Sparticus
Member

Buffing a passive that requires you to use an attack and also requires you to hit your target isn't exactly helpful.

Trade static charge for reroute for CH
Remove reroute from TlM and give them SA

Then CH don't have to waste a turn and make a clean hit to make RR useful and CH get the energy return same as with SC.
TlM do have to add DEX to make SA useful and a TlM who chooses to support abuse runs the risk of running out of energy and makes
their SA passive less useful.

That's how it used to be fair. Mercs had the attacking advantage but limited energy to produce those attacks.
Tactical Mercs are not Technician Mercs, they are not supposed to be masters of energy, they are supposed
to be masters of tactics to trick and defeat the enemy.

quote:

Quote = ED WIKI

Tactical Mercenary is an intellectual and crafty mercenary who uses tricks to defeat the enemy.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 314
9/4/2011 11:30:41   
Stabilis
Member

^ WAIT, NO!!!

Static charge is awesome, regardless of how much damage your primary does, level 10 static charge gives 21-22 energy per connecting strike! Its a great skill and a new skill and we should keep it.
AQ Epic  Post #: 315
9/4/2011 11:37:48   
Sparticus
Member

Yes its a fine skill but you have to use a turn for it to be useful.

Reroute would give you less energy but it would not use a turn and it would give you the energy every single turn.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 316
9/4/2011 12:02:01   
Stabilis
Member

Static + Good dexterity = Definite 21 energy gain every 2 turns.

Reroute + High health + High support/strength = About the same amount of energy gained. The difference is the "requirements" (High health, support or strength)

More flexibility with static charge.
AQ Epic  Post #: 317
9/4/2011 12:10:33   
Sparticus
Member

Your missing one item in your calculation.

quote:

Reroute + High health + High support/strength = About the same amount of energy gained. The difference is the "requirements" (High health, support or strength)


Add to this: plus one additional attack of your choosing including booster/field medic

The attack of Static Charge is fixed, based on your primary and still can miss despite your observations. A blockable attack hitting is never definite.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 318
9/4/2011 12:20:58   
Stabilis
Member

^ I beg to differ, with 86 dexterity I have advantage on people with dexterity even higher than mine.

< Message edited by greenrain13 -- 9/4/2011 12:44:28 >
AQ Epic  Post #: 319
9/4/2011 12:24:25   
tigura
Member

@above- Shadow arts doesnt affect your chance to hit the other person it affects your opponents chances of hitting you
DF Epic  Post #: 320
9/4/2011 12:43:54   
Stabilis
Member

^ Oh that's true I'll remove it from my post.

But anyways I usually have a better melee than my opponent.
AQ Epic  Post #: 321
9/4/2011 13:11:28   
Elf Priest JZaanu
Constructive!


 Response Originated from this post...
http://forums2.battleon.com/f/fb.asp?m=19573155



Ashari, hopefully this game can remove those enhancements completely. Over anything else, that addition has corrupted this game. Only reason it can't be removed is because what happens to people whom paid for them. What do they get as compensation or where would it be transferred to? If there is talk about balancing this game, you must address that issue. Non-buffing items with +1 damage is nothing more then a side step compared to enhancements. The other Mods can express about weapons being appropriate for their level all they wish, but most know where it really stands.

I would prefer this game would scrap enhancements as a failed attempt and credit everyone their credits/varium and just move forward.


A good analogy of the state of our current issues is a track runner.


The track runner runs on a track of 100 meters.

For the track runner to run faster and give this runner more enjoyment in more wins, this runner is provided enhancements, but for a fee.

Now the track runner is running fast and winning so much but it has created a balance issue with the other track runners...

The officials, to try to keep the balance more equal and to keep this runner running with the pack, now provide this runner now to run on track of 200 meters.


Now when you look at this analogy, what real difference has enhancements made other then paying twice to run on a longer track? The game has had a plethora of ideas and features to test and try, yet this one formula has been a constant dilemma in ED. Both Enhancements and Balance are quite polar in issue, so no true balance will ever be made as long as this system will remain in place.

As the Balance team is committed to making this game more equal, it will never happen unless enhancements are removed.


Eventually those players who are supplemented with enhancements will have to run on a track of 300 meters to sustain a deceptive balance.

I would like to know what are the long term plans to deal with enhancements from Moderators or Developers?


< Message edited by JZaanu -- 9/4/2011 13:12:35 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 322
9/4/2011 16:10:55   
frosty123
Member
 

 Fist TaM Then CH. For CH replace SA with First Strike( incrreases chance to strike first. ForTam replace Hybred with... Blood Shield
Post #: 323
9/4/2011 17:02:19   
Wiseman
Member

@JZaanu: You talk about compensation for Credit and Varium as if it's possible, the fact is it is "not" possible to reimburse players for their purchases. With that said we cannot remove enhancements from the game, because if we did there would be no way to compensate for them being removed.

We may add other stats to apply enhancements to in the future, that way the amount of enhancements can be spread out over a larger field of choices, which would thin down their impact on builds...but that's just one possibility, and it hasn't been confirmed. However I can 100% guarantee that enhancements are not going to be removed, they will remain a part of ED going forwarded, but they should never go above the maximum of 10 slots.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 324
9/4/2011 17:08:51   
DeathGuard
Member

If you can't remove the enchancements already bought, the new weps that you released, don't give them enchancement slots and that way no one loses. Releasing new weps without enchancements slots will be a great advance and maybe creativity may increase bewteen players.
AQ DF AQW Epic  Post #: 325
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel General Discussion >> RE: =ED= Balance Discussions
Page 13 of 30«<1112131415>»
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition