Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

What do you guys think about no 2v2 if your missing equipment?

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Suggestions >> What do you guys think about no 2v2 if your missing equipment?
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
2/17/2013 2:39:30   
My Name is Jake
Banned


 Do you think it would be a good idea if you're missing weapons or armour and above level 15 you shouldn't be allowed to do 2v2?
I think it's a good idea because it ruins fights especially if ur missing an armour.

I've moved your thread from the ED General Discussion Forum to the ED Suggestions Forum. In the future, please keep any suggestions-related threads in the ED Suggestions Forum. Thanks! ~eVentus

< Message edited by Eventus -- 2/17/2013 6:37:50 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 1
2/17/2013 2:42:39   
Blitzex/Sr. Zeph
Banned


 Nope,

That would be discriminating the less-equipped people.
They have equal rights to go in a 2vs2.

I understand why you want it tho, im also sick of these people.
I always rage if i get one as partner, but i always tell them they need to go NPC for some weps.
Most of the time they actually listen, so try that.

But there isnt much to do about it, sadly tho
Epic  Post #: 2
2/17/2013 2:45:55   
Mother1
Member

Not supported in the least. this would hurt everyone more then it would help them.

1 fights would take longer
2 Jugs will get less opponents
3 players without gear will be forced to 1 vs 1 if they don't want to NPC grind or can't do it successfully.
Epic  Post #: 3
2/17/2013 2:52:18   
Blaze The Aion Ender
Member

Technically, we all have an armor now, and it's impossible to be missing one...
But maybe above level 25 or so, because if you don't have full equipment at that time, you made some serious mistakes with your account

As much as I would love this, not supported, because as was said, it would be discrimination
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 4
2/17/2013 2:53:52   
Blitzex/Sr. Zeph
Banned
quote:

this would hurt everyone more then it would help them.

Thats not entirely true.

It helps the people who got stuck with one of those less-equiped people.
But the 3 points are true tho
Epic  Post #: 5
2/17/2013 3:05:21   
FishNoobCrack
Member

As long as I would love for this to be implemented (Due to the fact that I have terrible luck with partners), no.
This will only make finding players take EVEN longer, and that would mean that most lower levels cannot 2v2, especially considering the fact that weapons cost 5k+ at that level.

< Message edited by FishNoobCrack -- 2/17/2013 3:06:22 >
Post #: 6
2/17/2013 3:07:27   
My Name is Jake
Banned


 What about having basic sidearms and aux?
AQW Epic  Post #: 7
2/17/2013 3:15:14   
f4tal1tY
Member

Lol greedy side of me really wants this, but really? No, this is just plain selfish...

Like mother1 stated:
quote:

1 fights would take longer
2 Jugs will get less opponents
3 players without gear will be forced to 1 vs 1 if they don't want to NPC grind or can't do it successfully.


I would also like to add that people can easily farm for credits now (unlimited npc), so to all those out there with no gear, get farming!


< Message edited by Mecha Mario -- 2/17/2013 14:58:00 >
Epic  Post #: 8
2/17/2013 3:19:45   
Darkwing
Member

no, but I would support if your partner gets a temporary primary/gun/bazooka/armor only for the battle, if he has none.
Post #: 9
2/17/2013 3:28:32   
f4tal1tY
Member

@above then what the hell is the point of farming for credits to buy new gear? And it wouldn't make a difference, cuz the gears stats won't be customised to the build. Just farm for what you want...

< Message edited by Mecha Mario -- 2/17/2013 14:58:05 >
Epic  Post #: 10
2/17/2013 3:41:47   
My Name is Jake
Banned
quote:

That would be discriminating the less-equipped people.
They have equal rights to go in a 2vs2.

@BlitzexIf you ask me you should have no missing equipment at higher levels.
also in Omega you don't need to buy lots of different weps for different stats it's easier to afford all of the equipment.
Having starting sidearms and aux would help i think

quote:

1 fights would take longer
2 Jugs will get less opponents
3 players without gear will be forced to 1 vs 1 if they don't want to NPC grind or can't do it successfully.

@Mother1 I don't think fights taking longer is a bad thing or a problem and most of the time everyone has all their weps so it won't be longer than most fights.
doubt juggs would get a lot less opponents most players do have all equipment. don't know tho.
i think havign starting sidearms and aux would be a good idea

quote:

Lol greedy side of me really wants this, but really? No, this is just plain selfish...

@f4tal1tY It's greedy and selfish to want 2v2 to be more fair instead of sometimes getting a partner missing equipment making it easier win for the other side? this is news to me
AQW Epic  Post #: 11
2/17/2013 3:45:02   
f4tal1tY
Member

@above haha sadly everyone has an equal chance of getting placed with partners with missing equips, so, no, its not selfish of me. It is certainly not greedy and selfish to keep it fair. Really? Teach me how you think master!
Epic  Post #: 12
2/17/2013 4:15:18   
Mother1
Member

@ jake

By doing this it would take longer because you are cutting players out of the playing pool. We already have the following cutting out of the player pool.

1 people talking and hanging out at hangout spots such as OZ 7
2 Players out of your level range of dueling
3 Players doing 1 vs 1 fights
4 players doing juggernaut matches
5 players doing other 2 vs 2 matches.

Those right there cut into our playing pool when we are looking, and now you want to add people not fully equipped to it as well? There are many players who are saving for an aux they like or something else they like and they should suffer just because someone else wants to exclude them because they aren't fully equipped? Sound very selfish to me. People play 2 vs 2 because the rewards are greater, or because they like it. they shouldn't have to suffer because they are missing a piece of gear.
Epic  Post #: 13
2/17/2013 5:36:57   
ValkyrieKnight
Member

Not going to make a 10 page argument just going to state my personal opinion.

If I were to change this I would make it if you have only a primary meaning no robot, no sidearm, no auxiliary you should be pared up against people 5 ~ 7 levels below you to give you a fighting chance. This would go for both 2v2 and 1v1. Even at 5 ~ 7 levels higher with only a primary their arguably still on par with you.

Edit : Of course this will be implemented after level 15.

< Message edited by ValkyrieKnight -- 2/17/2013 5:38:34 >
AQW Epic  Post #: 14
2/17/2013 12:22:41   
Banir
Member

This wouldn't solve much. Some players with no aux can be better than people with all equipment. It's not a matter of how many weapons you have, but how many stats you have in the weapons.
Epic  Post #: 15
2/17/2013 13:47:39   
the final hour
Banned


 ^ sad but true sometimes

i sorta see where the OP is coming from with this is kinda disheartening to say the least when your level 35 fully equipped . and you get into 2v2 to find ur facing 2 level 35s fully equiped with a level 31 /32 partner with on ly a basic weapon with no stats / and minimum base damage . insta dead its extremely annoying .

i see other peoples points about it being unfair . but its also unfair on the partner of the unequiped partner whos either getting killed through them , or has alot more work to do through them.
Post #: 16
2/18/2013 2:30:47   
arthropleura
Member

Equipment isnt really the problem for me. I just feel that the majority of players lack... tactical sense? Ive made it through several battles with underequipped players who either listen or are smart. Ditchers and fools give me more trouble than anything else.
Maybe im just awesome :p
DF AQW Epic  Post #: 17
2/18/2013 6:58:28   
theholyfighter
Member

Not restricting them from doing 2vs2...

How about this:
Players with two equipment of any kind gets paired in a match.

Players with at least three equipment of any kind gets paired in a match.

(Currently there are 5 equipment: Primary, Sidearm, Auxiliary, Armor, and Robot.)
AQW Epic  Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [EpicDuel] >> EpicDuel Suggestions >> What do you guys think about no 2v2 if your missing equipment?
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition