Home  | Login  | Register  | Help  | Play 

RE: =OS= What would YOU like to see? III - READ THE FIRST POST

  		Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [Oversoul] >> Oversoul General Discussion >> RE: =OS= What would YOU like to see? III - READ THE FIRST POST
Page 16 of 29«<1415161718>»
Forum Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
11/21/2013 15:55:17   
SGsPyzcho
Banned


 I would like to see an Artifact for each element that charges up the element It is for at the same time that you charge your characters base element. It would be helpful for characters with cards of different elements or If you want to use CC and add cards of a different element. For example If I were using the Founder Champion which is light and I equipped a Shadow form of that Artifact It would charge shadow in sync with my light charging (charge 2 light and It charges 2 Shadow at the same time.) It should cost a reasonable amount of SGs or be at the end of a hard side quest/dungeon If they are ever implanted (not the current form of dungeon though, they are to easy.)

< Message edited by SGsPyzcho -- 11/21/2013 16:02:49 >
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 376
11/22/2013 1:51:00   
BJEBLE
Member

I think that if we could arrange our inventories so certain characters would show up first, it would be a lot easier to switch from farming in character A to character B.
DF  Post #: 377
11/22/2013 4:38:44   
survivor39
Member

@SGsPyzcho

I though about that dual element artifact too..However, the thing I realized with it is that it means the person who has this artifact gets double the total elemental energy than those without it. Now that seems a bit unfair to me.
What about an artifact that allows you to use the total energy as both elements. By that I mean, imagine you have Poison Drake (Shadow and Neutral)..if it charges up 20 shadow energy and you have a death flow in your CC deck, you then play the death flow card and 15 shadow energies will convert to 15 neutral energies and you are left 5 shadow energies..(so conversion only occurs during playing of the secondary element card) The only thing that could be a problem is that CC will allow you to change the characteristics of dual element characters. This artifact would allow you to make Poison Drake more 'Neutral' instead of 'Shadow' even though Poison drake is mainly shadow and slightly Neutral(i.e. insert more Corruption in CC!).
Another thing that might be a problem with this is that you'd have to replace your X-boosts artifact. I wonder if Nulgath can allow us to hold more than 1 or 2 artifacts at once in battle zone.
I don't know, what do you guys think?


@BJEBLE

I've been hoping for that too. Also, a delete character button would be nice!
I've been longing to get rid of unwanted characters such as peasant and blood fiend, barbarian,etc...
I'm really hoping Nulgath and the OS Team finally gets underway into full production so they can make the big changes promised for the game and also fix little things such as being able to arrange our characters.
Post #: 378
11/22/2013 10:13:29   
SGsPyzcho
Banned


 @Survivor39: I've taken in what you just said and It makes much more sense and is more fair for others then what I've been thinking. I completely agree lol. Although in the case that we cannot hold more then 1 Artifact Nulgath can release a card similar If not exactly the same as Neutralize for every element available as a 5 star card in CC.

@BJEBLE: I would also like to be able to rearrange my character inventory.

< Message edited by SGsPyzcho -- 11/22/2013 10:52:30 >
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 379
11/22/2013 10:17:53   
clintonian
Member

Thok for upholder char
Post #: 380
11/22/2013 10:30:59   
Megadragonknight
Member

@Clinton
That would be awesome.

But Gold Dragon for upholder character.
Post #: 381
11/22/2013 12:53:20   
SGsPyzcho
Banned


 It would be fun to use a Gold Dragon but I think It would be neat If Anauel The Arch Angel was the 1st Upholder character since she was the games very first NPC.

< Message edited by SGsPyzcho -- 11/22/2013 12:54:07 >
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 382
11/23/2013 10:22:11   
Kiazz
Member

Referencing @Mega's point over in the beta thread, I think that sacrifice should be treated as an attack card. With the advent of a lightning/shadow character that RELIES on super charged to justify it's dual element use, I also thing that life drain+blood rage should be treated as such, damage-wise at least. Currently, they jam up its energy use; the amount of luck needed to get at least an attack card and an energize, followed by a super charged, and ideally four attack cards is extremely difficult and hard to fit in with shadow's best assets >DoTs, HP conversion into damage, and less-than-ideal but still, present (which is an edge over elements with no heals) regeneration.
Post #: 383
11/23/2013 10:27:41   
Wolfassassin
Member

I agree that sacrifice should be treated as an attack card. Blood rage and life drain, not so sure. Blood rage is unblockable, and life drain does more than just attack. If they were treated as attacks, that means you could use empower on them.

I know that Tazer is an unblockable and works with super charge, though....

< Message edited by Wolfassassin -- 11/23/2013 10:47:24 >
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 384
11/23/2013 10:48:03   
Megadragonknight
Member

Definitely to concur that Life Drain, Blood Rage and Sacrifice should be treated as attack card. If they can work on combo bonus, then discarding it should also work out. That's why its weird in the first place why sacrifice, life drain and blood rage are not attack card. They are not even a spell card so they should be consider attack card. Its what we really think and suggest and its now up to Nulgath to decide and solve this issue.
Post #: 385
11/23/2013 10:59:45   
Kiazz
Member

Life Drain is basically a normal heal and a 500 attack card with an extra point to make up for the card space used. Blood Rage, eh, 800 pierce for 3 and 300 HP does seem kinda op. But then, there's the 4 for 700 pierce on fire with incinerate and no health. Of course, they're different elements, so how can I compare them?

Also, how about improving water somehow? It's outclassed by light in terms of heal efficiency, has a 13 for 1500 rather than 12, and has a +10 charge that requires two cards (Arguably the weakest of the three.) It's hard to choose water over any of the current elements.
Post #: 386
11/23/2013 11:07:52   
Megadragonknight
Member

Blood Rage with empower deal 800 pierce damage, Blood Rage with supercharged plus charged deal 1300 pierce damage, oh no, OP. I forgot to consider that. This topic is being subjective too. No matter what point we make all make and agree or not, it will end up being too subjective overall. I think we should leave to Nulgath to decide if he consider sacrifice, blood rage and life drain an attack card or not. But we must ensure it have to stay balance.
Post #: 387
11/23/2013 11:38:35   
Wolfassassin
Member

@Kiazz

Yeah, Water has close to nothing going for it right now. A remake of a few cards, or the release of newer cards would be necessary.
AQ DF MQ AQW Epic  Post #: 388
11/24/2013 19:39:46   
Jacke21777
Member

Name change, for a price, of course. I recently changed my name over in AQW and would like a chance to reinvent myself... maybe one free name change for beta-testing? It would be alright, even if it was for sgs. :o

@below Why not? It's easy coding and a way for some people to spend Sgs. It's an extra feature that could potentially be useful; maybe you're satisfied with your name. How can you speak for everyone else?

< Message edited by Jacke21777 -- 11/25/2013 1:40:04 >
Post #: 389
11/24/2013 20:07:49   
clintonian
Member

IMO I don't think name change is necessary in Oversoul.
Post #: 390
11/24/2013 21:01:32   
The Finnish Phoenix
Member

Using Empower in conjunction with SuperCharged wouldn't be OP or even remotely good since you'd be left with just one other attack card. Besides, compatibility with SuperCharged doesn't necessarily mean compatibility with Empower. See Shadow Fire.
AQ DF MQ  Post #: 391
11/24/2013 21:04:00   
Megadragonknight
Member

@TFP
I remembered you said Supercharged increase shadowfire by 500 damage, is it? If so, that will deal 1500 damage instantly. Oh man, i wonder if its intended or not since Supercharged only increase attack card damage by 500.
Post #: 392
11/24/2013 21:15:03   
The Finnish Phoenix
Member

Yeah, Super makes it 1500. It would be interesting to see if it's possible to CC it on ManaGuardian and buff Meteorite. I'm on a phone and can't test right now, but that'd be lulztastic.
AQ DF MQ  Post #: 393
11/24/2013 21:18:26   
Megadragonknight
Member

I would love to test it on my CC supercharged with meteorite to check if it work out when i am free to. Mana Guardian will be a very deadly character if Meteorite work out with supercharged. 2K damage instantly!
Post #: 394
11/25/2013 10:28:02   
SGsPyzcho
Banned


 About the name change, I agree. It won't be hard to put in game and can get more money for OverSoul If It costs SGs. And even If some of you above don't want to change your name others may want to and It can support the game even If It's just a little. Although I wouldn't change my name I think It should be released and I see no reason why It can't be.

< Message edited by SGsPyzcho -- 11/25/2013 10:32:25 >
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 395
11/25/2013 13:09:41   
  Kokujoe
Moderator


 ^^@SG And I definitely second that since it'd help fund OS towards its release as a complete game! Would love to see it [name change] get implemented at the earliest, if possible?! I happen to be one of many unfortunate souls, who managed to mess up his username in OS and boy do I regret it!

But the final decision has to be made by Nulgath's [OS Game Lead], himself.


Kokujoe X____x* [KO'd]
Post #: 396
11/25/2013 14:08:50   
Andlu
Member

I agree. 1st upholder character gotta be a dragon D:
AQ DF AQW  Post #: 397
11/25/2013 14:16:52   
SGsPyzcho
Banned


 @kokujoe: Yeah hopefully Nulgath reads this thread and considers it. And I'm with you there, I can't wait to see the day that OverSoul is fully complete so everything dollar counts until then.

@Andlu: It should be a Void Dragon with the AQ design. I think that would be interesting to walk around with and use in battle plus It can be the first Chaos character unless Nulgath decides to make It Shadow. I've suggested it before and others have agreed with me so maybe he should do It, unless you guys disagree but I think It's a good idea since we're on the Dragon topic.

< Message edited by SGsPyzcho -- 11/25/2013 14:20:58 >
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 398
11/25/2013 15:37:14   
  Kokujoe
Moderator


 I'm still not too sure about what's this buzz regarding the 1st upholder character being a dragon,lately. But I, for one, would love to see something completely unique. (Dragons sound a bit too clichéd imho)
P.S.--> Surprise us Nulgath (the kind one)!


^^@SG But I do like your proposal to make it the 1st chaos based char for whatever its worth!



~Kokujoe X___x* [KO'd]
Post #: 399
11/25/2013 18:51:02   
SGsPyzcho
Banned


 I don't know why people want It to be a Dragon either but as long as they keep saying that I would prefer the Void Dragon and thank you lol. I do think It's time a chaos character is released, I mean It's only been a year.
AQ DF MQ AQW  Post #: 400
Page:   <<   < prev  14 15 [16] 17 18   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [Oversoul] >> Oversoul General Discussion >> RE: =OS= What would YOU like to see? III - READ THE FIRST POST
Page 16 of 29«<1415161718>»
Jump to:






Icon Legend
New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Forum Content Copyright © 2018 Artix Entertainment, LLC.

"AdventureQuest", "DragonFable", "MechQuest", "EpicDuel", "BattleOn.com", "AdventureQuest Worlds", "Artix Entertainment"
and all game character names are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Artix Entertainment, LLC. All rights are reserved.
PRIVACY POLICY


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition