I have to agree that Pure Backlash on the Pet would not make it very comparable to Angra Linnorm which is also a half Backlash Pet but also as cupquake said, the attack animations would rather be skipped as well and just be pure backlash in that mode.
Angra Linnorm is one of very few F2P booster pets, so it's fine. However, Frostwyrm Shaman Totem really should go all the way with its backlash. It still does double the damage of Angra Linnorm, but it's just a weird decision. Backlash pets and guests have no reason to attack.
Yes, the Pet should do full Backlash and not attack the monsters,as a Backlasher i would want a pure Backlash Pet if i were to try the build in the first place.
Pure backlash on the pet would be nice, but I understand if the staff won't make that kind of effect if they consider it overpowered
We already have an elemental Backlash Guest for Darkness,and i do not know why they decided to go with a half Backlash Pet this time around with Angra already here but having a dedicated Backlash elemental Pet is not more unbalanced than having elemental boosters in the first place, its just that the more you get focused on one thing the better you do the job for that one thing.
I want to suggest if possible that the Pet to be considered tweaked to be full Backlash mode in that mode and having no attack animation on monsters just some kind of a buff-type art. Thanks!
The weapon is just terrible. I don't know why we need a Savage Troll Club clone. It does nothing since the element is irrelevant. All the players who use it, use it with zerkers or H series which locks the element.
I agree on the fact that the weapon is not only a clone but also offplaced, i suggested a Backlash weapon with MC for potency like Shark Sabre instead, would definitely fuel the Backlash theme for this set and the top 100 players wont be as upset as having a clone of an existing item as their prize just different element, oh and it also has a proc!
< Message edited by LUPUL LUNATIC -- 9/10/2021 17:39:34 >