RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Artix Entertainment Games] >> [AdventureQuest] >> AdventureQuest General Discussion



Message

sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 19:34:29)

well....i use...assassin and.... paladin.... i hit so high with frankenglaive HM CIT and LO



Edgemaster Scion -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:41:53)

Award for most awesome class goes to...Fighter.



master mix -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:43:51)

DRACOPYRE!

Awesome defensive stats, does good damage, and heals (along with breath attack for lvl 70 guardians)!

What more could you ask for?!



Edgemaster Scion -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:45:54)

Pretty sure Draco ain't a class, but I guess with three skills it could be counted somewhat.



Chii -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:47:49)

More so in the future. We plan on expanding the subraces to have numerous abilities. I don't know if we'll go all the way to 10, but it's possible.



Edgemaster Scion -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:50:47)

So, Subraces have a chance at becoming semi-classes? Does that include improvement of werepyre and vamp + were forms?



Chii -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:52:31)

All the subraces will be so touched up. Vamp/Lycan will probably become equivalent to tier 1, Werepyre as tier 2. Whether or not higher level versions of them will be made is not yet known (same as classes. I think it's generally in a "Probably yeah eventually" category).



Edgemaster Scion -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:53:45)

Lol, "Probably yeah eventually." That's...interesting.



sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:58:03)

so its a " ehhh... sure... alright" thing?[:D]



Epsilon2012 -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:59:12)

Any word on the Chronomancer Class?



Khimera -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 20:59:48)

@Epsilon: You mean the one that doesn't exist, isn't planned and has never been mentioned in any official capacity?



sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 21:09:25)

.... i thinks thats for AQW...



jon_snow -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 21:15:18)

being an adventurer most classes are terrible. Only one i use is dracopyre for draining bite... all others i can only use meaningless skills. oh well



Shirefolk -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 23:40:42)

I used Fighter a lot on my secondary when he was a low level. I jacked up his strength to 200 around level 60 (so...much...maze farming @.@) and then used Power Strike (or whatever the level 10 skill is called) for some 1337 damage :P



sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 23:46:50)

.... 1337 damage?....[:D]



Shirefolk -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 23:48:28)

'leet', short for 'elite' I was poking fun at the general trend of inexperienced players to use numbers instead of letters in their words.

Ah well >_>



Human Psychology -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 23:51:31)

Fear not Shirefolk your reference was not written in vain. Some, if not a lot, of us got it. However "leet" speak is not to be automatically attributed to so-called inexperienced players.

I can't wait to see an updated Dracomancer class. It has tons of potential, in my opinion, with a unique feel to it.



sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/4/2010 23:51:34)

^ yea i know.... i am not a nooby.... anymore[:D]



Ferality -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 0:06:46)

Honestly remember spamming constantly UM in obsidian cloak. It used to be my favorite armor in the 70-90.. Till I found the mastercrafts :P. Now I use any class i feel like... Just swap out (recently played with Dracomancer) which is stronger then I last remembered :D.

Edit: Also, I remember the VAMP armor was awesome. I was all for vampire > werewolf and the turn into alpha vampire happened like.. Every other turn. Idk about now, but back then, the werewolf/vampire classes were sweet!



sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 0:08:45)

ye meam amours... not classes



caseybp -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 0:10:28)

I also like the Draco pyre class/armor a lot because ever since I got it I’ve been hitting a lot higher than I’ve ever been able to before. Not sure if 300 something damage is a lot for a lv 70 to all u pros but to me it’s a ton.



sir lane -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 0:11:30)

awww good times when i though 300 was a lot of damage.... but now i can hit the damage cap easily... with assassins



caseybp -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 0:26:13)

Just...with normal attack.



BlackAces -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 0:29:07)

With normal attacks 300 damage is pretty decent for a level 70.



ugauga -> RE: =AK= Ultimate Class Discussion Thread (11/5/2010 1:10:51)

Dracopyre. I love Werewolves and Dragons (vamps no much). Without count the unbeliavable damage that a Dracopyre of Night Armor level 10 can do (I think that my record was 565).[:D]



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition
0.078125